Forest Products, Incorporated, manufactures three products (FP-10, FP-20, and FP-40) from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $240,000. Additional information follows:

Product	Units Produced	Sales Values	Processing Costs (After Split-Off)
FP-10	66,000	$ 168,000	$ 28,000
FP-20	99,000	308,000	108,000
FP-40	55,000	84,000	24,000

The sale of FP-40 has been banned by a recent law. If FP-40 is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $120,000 for every 55,000 units produced.

Required:

Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP-10 and FP-20?

There is a possibility that a market for FP-10 and FP-20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further?

At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP-40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP-40 produced?

rorest rroducts, Incorporated, manutactures three products ( rHIU,rHLU, and rH4U) trom a single, JoInt Input. INone of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $240,000. Additional information follows: The sale of FP-40 has been banned by a recent law. If FP-40 is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $120,000 for every 55,000 units produced. Required: a. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP-10 and FP-20? b. There is a possibility that a market for FP-10 and FP-20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further? c. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP-40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP-40 produced? Answer is not complete. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP-10 and FP-20? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. rorest rroducts, Incorporated, manutactures three products ( HHIU,rHLU, and rH4U) ) trom a single, joInt Input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $240,000. Additional information follows: The sale of FP-40 has been banned by a recent law. If FP-40 is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $120,000 for every 55,000 units produced. Required: a. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP-10 and FP-20? b. There is a possibility that a market for FP-10 and FP-20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further? c. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP-40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP-40 produced? Answer is not complete. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. There is a possibility that a market for FP-10 and FP-20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further? Forest Products, Incorporated, manufactures three products (FP-10, FP-20, and FP-40) from a single, joint input. None of the products can be sold without further processing. In November, joint product costs were $240,000. Additional information follows: The sale of FP-40 has been banned by a recent law. If FP-40 is produced, disposal in an approved manner costs $120,000 for every 55,000 units produced. Required: a. Assuming that Forest Products continues to use the physical quantities method of allocation and to manufacture and sell FP-10 and FP-20. What joint costs would be allocated to FP-10 and FP-20? b. There is a possibility that a market for FP-10 and FP-20 at split-off will develop. In other words, it will be possible to sell the two products rather than process them further. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further? c. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP-40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP-40 produced? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. At what sales value (at split-off) would Forest Products be indifferent between selling them at split-off and processing them further, in case the disposal cost for FP-40 increases to $150,000 for every 55,000 units of FP-40 produced