Question
Four studies were done to measure the risk of heart attack among males who were age 60 years at enrollment. Each study subject was followed
Four studies were done to measure the risk of heart attack among males who were age 60 years at enrollment. Each study subject was followed for the entire follow-up period; there were no drop-outs or loss to follow-up. Details from each of these studies is shown below.
# of subjects | Time followed | Number of cases | ||
Study 1 | 100 | 10 years | 10 | 0.10 |
Study 2 | 200 | 7 years | 14 | 0.07 |
Study 3 | 300 | 5 years | 18 | 0.06 |
Study 4 | 400 | 2 years | 8 | 0.02 |
Is it correct to conclude that the risk (shown in the last column) of heart attack was greatest in Study 1? Choose the best answer.
a) It is incorrect. For each study, one must divide the number of new cases by the total number of accumulated person*years in order to compare the risks.
b)It is incorrect. The follow-up period is different for each study. One cannot directly compare a 10-year risk with (for example) a 7-year risk.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started