Fran contracted with Greg's Garages to construct a new 12' times 12' garage. When the garage was finished it measured 12' times 11'11.8" and Fran refused to pay. Fran sued Greg for breach of contract seeking to rescind the contract. Greg countersued for breach of contract requesting monetary damages. The likely result would be: Since there was substantial performance, rescission would likely not be granted. Greg would recover compensatory damages with some offset/adjustment to the damages for the minor difference in the size of the garage. The Court would rescind the contract, as the contract was not fully performed according to the specifications. The Court would rescind the contract, due to a unilateral mistake. Rescission would be denied, because Fran didn't object to the variation on a timely basis. None of the above