Question
Frank Frausto delivered newspapers for Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., under a renewable 6- month contract called a Delivery Agent Agreement. The agreement identified Fausto as an
Frank Frausto delivered newspapers for Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., under a renewable 6- month contract called a Delivery Agent Agreement. The agreement identified Fausto as an independent contractor. Phoenix collected payments from customers and responded to customer complaints regarding delivery. Frausto was assigned the route for his deliveries and was required to deliver the papers within a certain time period each day. Frausto used his own vehicle to deliver the papers and had to provide proof of insurance to Phoenix. Phoenix provided Frausto with health insurance, but did not withhold taxes from his weekly income. One morning while delivering papers, Frausto collided with a motorcycle ridden by William Santiago. Santiago filed a negligence action against both Frausto and Phoenix. Phoenix argued that it had no liability for the accident because Frausto was an independent contractor, and under therefore Phoenix was not the master and could not be called to account for the wrongs of its servant under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
a. Discuss the factors a court would consider in determining whether Frausto was an employee or independent contractor to Phoenix.
b. If you were sitting as the court, what would you decide? Was Frausto an independent contractor or employee? Are there any other facts or factors you would consider before making that decision?
Li worked for Packard Bioscience, and Schmeizl was her supervisor. In March, Schmeizl asked Li to call Packards competitors and pretend to be a potential customer in order to obtain pricing information and literature on their products. Li refused because she believed that the requested work was illegal and suggested that Schmeizl speak with the legal department who simply advised against the practice. Schmeizl insisted, Li continued to refuse, and Schmeizl wrote negative performance reviews because Li was unable to get the requested information. Li was ultimately terminated for poor performance and brought a wrongful discharge action. Do you think that Li could prevail in such an action?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started