From the book, "INTRODUCTION TO STUDY OF U.S.LAW" After reviewing Terry v. Ohio on pages 563 to 573, Was the search of Terry appropriate? Why or why not? Was the State allowed to use the gun seized from Terry as evidence at trial? Why did Justice Douglas disagree with the majority? Be specific! Using the Terry decision as the basis for your answer, what legitimate reasons might an officer have to search someone even in the absence of probable cause to make an arrest