Question
G9.19 The criminal justice analogy. A jury having heard the evidence in a criminal case is debating whether to render a verdict of guilty or
G9.19
The criminal justice analogy. A jury having heard the evidence in a criminal case is debating whether to render a verdict of guilty or not guilty. Because it is worse to convict an innocent person of a crime they did not commit than to let a guilty person go free, each case starts with a presumption of innocence. This is analogous to the presumption that H0 is true in a statistical hypothesis test. Other analogies exist. To make these connections, fill in the cells of a table with the following labels: (a) Acquittal of an innocent person, (b) Conviction of an innocent person, (c) Acquittal of a guilty person, (d) Declaring a criminal guilty. Which is analogous to a type I error? Which is analogous to a type II error?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started