Gabrieli bought a truck from a dealer, Transit Inc. Gabrieli signed a "purchase order" on May 12, at which time Transit ordered the truck from the manufacturer. It was agreed that the sale was subject to Gabrieli's being able to arrange suitable financing.

Three weeks later, Gabrieli informed Transit that she had been able to obtain a loan from her bank and was in a position to give Transit a bank draft for the full price. Transit confirmed that the arrangement was satisfactory. On August 2, the truck was delivered to Transit from the manufacturer. Transit called Gabrieli, telling her, "Your truck is here and ready for you to collect." Gabrieli went straight to the Transit premises, handed over the bank draft, and received the keys, papers, and truck. At that time, Transit's sales manager also handed her a number of other documents, including one the manager described as "your warranty," which he asked Gabrieli to sign. Gabrieli did so. The document gave a limited one-year warranty for defects but excluded implied warranties and excluded liability for consequential damages.

The truck proved to be defective and soon developed a number of faults. Gabrieli took the truck back to Transit on numerous occasions for various repairs, but these were mostly unsuccessful. Finally, after more than two years of unsatisfactory operation, Gabrieli returned the truck to Transit and demanded her money back.

Transit denied liability, pointing to the one-year warranty that excluded the statutory implied warranties.

Is Gabrieli entitled to any remedy? Why or why not?