Garrett and his wife checked into the St$.$Louis Airport North Holiday Inn on March $29,$taking advantage of the hotel$$s $$Park and Fly$$package$,$ which provided one night of lodging to individuals, provided a shuttle service to Lambert International Airport, and allowed individuals to keep a vehicle on the hotel$$s parking lot for up to two weeks. When the Garretts returned from their vacation on April $17,$they discovered that their vehicle was stolen. They sued the hotel, contending that a special relationship of an innkeeper and guest was created by the $$Park and Fly$$marketing package, and that the hotel$$s knowledge of criminal activity on its parking lot created a duty to warn the Garretts, which it failed to do$.$ What status did the Garretts have with the hotel regarding the protection of their vehicle after boarding the plane on their vacation trip? Was there a bailment of the vehicle under the $$Park and Fly$$marketing package? $[$Garrett v$.$IMPAC Hotels Inc.,