Generally speaking there are three primary ways of discriminating under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: disparate treatment; disparate impact; and hostile work-environment. The below case specifically describes a case of disparate treatment of a Muslim job applicant by Abercrombie & Fitch. Describe the facts of the case and state your understanding of the Court's rationale in finding there was disparate treatment. Further, change the circumstances around and create your own facts describing a scenario in which the plaintiff experienced disparate impact discrimination, and another scenario in which you can assume this person is hired, but then experiences a hostile work environment. Under which facts could that scenario exist?