George Bennett was hired by Bragg Brothers Limited, for the position of business agent. The secretary-treasurer of the company told him that the duration of his employment depends on how satisfied the top management is with his work. During this time, a subpoena was issued to Bennett by the California legislature to give evidence in front of a committee that was investigating corruption inside Bragg Brothers. The company directed Bennett to falsify his statements, but he truthfully answered the questions posed by the committee. The next day, he was fired from his job. Is the company justified in its action under the employment at-will doctrine?