George Richert agreed to retain Crye$-$Leike Realtors as his sole and exclusive real estate agent to find a building for Richert$$s business. The agency contract was signed by Richert and by Colman Borosky for Crye$-$Leike. All parties understood that Richert would soon form a corporation that would be the actual party to lease the building found by Crye$-$Leike. A month later, Richert formed WDM Inc. Richert was president and CEO. WDM never formally adopted the agency contract with Crye$-$Leike. However, Crye$-$Leike contacted various landlords for WDM$,$ showed several properties to WDM$,$ and prepared an offer to lease space on behalf of WDM$.$ All these efforts were done with Richert$$s full knowledge. When WDM hired another real estate agent, Crye$-$Leike sued for breach of the exclusive agency contract. WDM claimed that it was not a party to the contract between Richert and Crye$-$Leike. Was WDM correct?