1. Germ-line engineering (GLE) for non-medical purposes is extremely controversial, even when we assume that it's safe, effective, and accessible.Julian Savulescu argues that we have a moral obligation to enhance traits for non-medical purposes. Explain his central argument for this conclusion. Then evaluate the argument itself.Must we accept the conclusion on the basis of the argument?Why or why not?

• Your evaluation of Savulescu's argument must include an explanation of Sandel's criticism of his view. And your position on germ-line engineering must be informed by and related to this discussion.
• If you're arguing that Savulescu's right and his argument goes through, you're on the left-hand side of the Structuring AEs table; if you're arguing against Savulescu, you're on the right hand side.