give as much detail in your explanation

In the Johns Manville asbestos litigation, Sam- uel Greenstone, an attorney for 11 asbestos workers, settled their claims for $30,000 and a promise that he would not "directly or indirectly participate in the bringing of new actions against the Corporation." The 1933 case settlement was documented in the minutes of Johns-Manville's board meeting. Could the informa- tion in the minutes be used in later litigation against Johns-Manville? How could a plaintiff's attorney obtain the information? Do you feel Mr. Greenstone made an ethical decision in his agreement? Wasn't his loy- alty to his 11 clients and his obligation to obtain com- pensation for them? Would you have agreed to the no-further-participation-in-a-lawsuit clause? Would you, if you had been an executive at Johns-Manville, have supported the clause