Godfrey Camille (from the George Vaillant Study video) and Riley Everetts (from Case Studies in Lifespan Development handout) life events followed very different paths yet both individuals arrived at parallel places by the end of their lives. Using examples from each of their lifes journeys, discuss how Erik Eriksons stages of Generativity/Stagnation and Integrity/Despair, and Maslows needs for love/belonging, esteem, experience/purpose, and self-actualization apply to their experiences. What conclusions about lifespan development can you draw from the fact that their very different life experiences led them both to a state of integrity and self-actualization? Finally, why might Viktor Frankl or Eckhart Tolles perspective of purpose appeal to Godfrey? Appeal to Riley? Make sure to explain the perspective and why it would be Godfreys/Rileys choice.