Golfco, a golf course management company, adopted a hiring plan designed to increase gender diversity in its workforce. Pursuant to this plan, the plaintiff, a male groundskeeper, was rejected for a promotion in favor of a female applicant. During a Golfco tournament two days later, the plaintiff and several coworkers walked the sidelines chanting loudly \"Golfco discriminates!" All were fired the next day. The plaintiff sued in federal court for retaliation under the federal anti-discrimination laws, alleging all of the above facts and stating, \"I was terminated solely on account of complaining about sex discrimination and not for any legitimate business reason." Assume that it is common knowledge that golf tournaments require spectators to keep quiet avoid distracting golfers. Golfco files a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). How should the court rule on Golfco's motion? (A) The court should grant the motion, because the plaintiff's allegations, taken as true, along with common knowledge, suggest an obvious alternative legal explanation for his termination. (B) The court should grant the motion, because the complaints allegations are entirely conclusory. (C) The court should deny the motion, because discrimination is the most likely explanation for the plaintiff's termination. (D) The court should deny the motion, because every litigant who files a complaint is entitled to get discovery