• Google and read the case law Fernandez v. California, 571 U.S. 292 (2014); and

Answer the following questions:

How did the Supreme Court rule on the following issues?

(1) Should consent giving by the petitioner's significant other, Rojas, be deemed invalid because such was given after the petitioner was taking away by law enforcement?

(2) Does the fact that petitioner objected to the search, at first, before he was taking away by law enforcement, satisfy the narrow exception in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 to set aside Rojas's consent?

Law cases can be found using the following websites:

• https://www.findlaw.com/
• https://www.supremecourt.gov/
• https://www.oyez.org/