Granny was crossing the street legally at a crosswalk when the snide young driver of the sports car waiting for her starting honking and yelling at her to hurry up. Granny thought she'd teach this rude young man a lesson, so she whacked his car as hard as she could with her handbag before she finished crossing the street. The handbag busted a headlight. The rude young man claims Granny should have to pay for the light because she committed an intentional property tort. Granny's could probably win the case based on the argument that

Group of answer choices

it wasn't intentional because Granny didn't intend to break the headlight.

it wasn't really a tort because the rude sports car driver was not harmed.

he deserved it.

None of the arguments is any good. Granny will lose.