Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

gvkey conm fyear act at ebit lct lt ni re sale ME 3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2008 3336.6 $11,073.30 1199.9 1574.7 $6,352.40 $978.40 3938.8 $12,731.20

gvkey conm fyear act at ebit lct lt ni re sale ME
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2008 3336.6 $11,073.30 1199.9 1574.7 $6,352.40 $978.40 3938.8 $12,731.20 $7,287.34
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2009 3960.1 $11,738.00 1306 2036.2 $6,809.10 $725.80 4131.8 $12,079.40 $10,194.32
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2010 3899.3 $11,408.70 1328.4 2125.6 $6,700.20 $817.00 4630.9 $12,303.10 $9,268.96
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2011 3218.8 $11,441.90 849.2 2225.2 $6,905.90 $467.90 4466 $13,262.60 $10,760.96
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2012 4379.8 $20,405.30 1619.9 3401.3 $15,042.30 $773.90 4933.4 $15,491.40 $12,374.22
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2013 4230.8 $19,366.40 1699.5 2642.4 $14,011.20 $303.10 4876.3 $17,702.60 $14,218.54
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2014 3667.7 $17,542.20 1557.2 3310.2 $12,932.20 ($252.60) 4001.6 $15,832.40 $15,535.28
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2015 3576.7 $13,390.60 1242.8 2532.4 $9,595.80 ($677.00) 2873.8 $11,642.90 $18,468.82
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2016 2013.2 $10,096.30 1234.5 1720.5 $6,018.50 $639.30 4034.1 $7,826.90 $16,473.37
3362 CONAGRA BRANDS INC 2017 1938.9 $10,389.50 1279.2 2336.2 $6,632.90 $808.40 4634.4 $7,938.30 $14,722.53
9411 HILLSHIRE BRANDS CO 2009 3830 $9,417.00 1035 2846 $7,359.00 $364.00 2116 $12,881.00 $8,473.11
9411 HILLSHIRE BRANDS CO 2010 3810 $8,836.00 958 2723 $7,321.00 $506.00 1560 $10,793.00 $11,593.69
9411 HILLSHIRE BRANDS CO 2011 4584 $9,533.00 813 4122 $7,559.00 $1,287.00 1977 $8,681.00 $11,107.93
9411 HILLSHIRE BRANDS CO 2012 1002 $2,450.00 329 833 $2,215.00 $845.00 151 $4,094.00 $3,394.92
9411 HILLSHIRE BRANDS CO 2013 1106 $2,434.00 358 671 $1,950.00 $252.00 336 $3,920.00 $4,121.41
10846 UNILEVER NV 2009 9920.61 $32,932.07 3869.64 10164.25 $14,045.36 $2,969.59 23693.66 $31,411.44 $49,935.27
10846 UNILEVER NV 2010 10316.65 $31,921.23 4630.882 11286.61 $10,134.86 $3,445.96 26250.06 $31,286.98 $48,492.53
12761 SUNOPTA INC 2009 309.816 $551.29 25.67 225.903 $276.59 ($6.76) 46.225 $989.13 $218.34
12761 SUNOPTA INC 2010 332.707 $609.68 39.725 234.264 $304.45 $61.07 98.045 $898.93 $512.21
12761 SUNOPTA INC 2011 365.308 $631.50 34.141 269.63 $316.56 $5.30 102.89 $1,082.08 $317.14
12761 SUNOPTA INC 2012 407.492 $707.31 45.926 279.52 $363.78 $24.22 126.269 $1,091.06 $371.62
12761 SUNOPTA INC 2013 419.729 $705.94 37.475 287.156 $363.32 ($8.52) 119.605 $1,181.93 $665.95
12978 KRAFT FOODS GROUP INC 2012 4823 $23,329.00 2883 3606 $19,757.00 $1,642.00 -666 $18,380.00 $26,952.98
12978 KRAFT FOODS GROUP INC 2013 4908 $23,148.00 4881 3410 $17,961.00 $2,715.00 782 $18,218.00 $32,142.98
12978 KRAFT FOODS GROUP INC 2014 4791 $22,947.00 1997 4773 $18,582.00 $1,043.00 483 $18,205.00 $36,802.22
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2009 38491.99 $107,082.45 12765.01 34835.88 $55,305.08 $10,067.58 0 $97,102.72 $168,603.70
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2010 41623.44 $119,160.00 14983.46 32176.33 $52,346.04 $36,538.59 0 $111,658.66 $191,310.64
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2011 35549.39 $121,710.05 14054.83 37584.81 $59,544.49 $10,120.55 0 $89,443.14 $183,176.02
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2012 38454.4 $137,879.85 15729.11 42329.87 $69,497.54 $11,590.39 0 $100,845.44 $207,642.17
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2013 33766.85 $135,267.30 14805.71 36968.78 $63,233.38 $11,247.75 0 $103,743.26 $234,193.19
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2014 34186.63 $134,336.62 13989.33 33113.55 $61,975.04 $14,552.04 0 $92,475.34 $232,611.25
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2015 29384.05 $123,781.57 13156.63 33264.45 $59,904.16 $9,050.61 0 $88,931.82 $229,721.22
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2016 31537.4 $129,823.82 13458.66 36926.18 $64,881.89 $8,396.65 0 $88,372.05 $222,665.88
16603 NESTLE SA/AG 2017 33056.07 $133,887.86 14439.31 37024.03 $69,421.85 $7,376.26 0 $92,545.70 $262,932.20
  1. Compute Altmans five factors used to predict bankruptcy.
  2. Weight each of those factors using Altmans bankruptcy prediction weights to arrive at Altmans Z score.
  3. Classify each company as either in the distress zone, gray zone, or safe zone for bankruptcy using Altmans classifications through use of a histogram.
  4. Interpret the result of the classifications. Elaborate what the result means.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Financial Accounting An Introduction

Authors: Pauline Weetman

7th Edition

1292086696, 978-1292086699

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

How can the explanatory variables be checked for collinearity?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

=+e. User: uses the item or service.11

Answered: 1 week ago