Question
Hans Pet Constructions Pty Ltd v Cassar [2005] NSWCA 230 Allegation: Cassars did faulty work on tiling job Judge gives directions to Hans Pet to
Hans Pet Constructions Pty Ltd v Cassar [2005] NSWCA 230
Allegation: Cassars did faulty work on tiling job
Judge gives directions to Hans Pet to deliver particulars by a certain date - Hans Pet does not comply with direction on time, but does deliver 6 weeks before hearing
Cassars complain that there is not enough time to review - Seek to vacate hearing date
Magistrate advises that issue will be taken up at scheduled hearing
At hearing, Magistrate finds that Cassars did not file notice of motion to vacate hearing date and vacates Cassars'defences
What principles are involved here and how is the NSWCAlikely to find?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Introduction To Business Law
Authors: Jeff Rey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson
3rd Edition
978-0324826999, 0324826990
