Harper has dominated the glass mug industry for decades. Everyone buys her type of specially designed mug invented in 1995 but which really started to become popular eight years ago. Three weeks after the sales started upward, Harper applied for and received legal protection for the name that it coined for its specially designed mugs, the "Steineroo." Harper even had an advertising campaign, with a catchy little tune, praising the virtues of the "Steineroo." By the time that campaign ended (about seven years ago), and continuing ever since, people have routinely used the word "Steineroo" to describe all specially designed mugs, including those made by Harper's competitors. Yesterday, Harper saw a television commercial in which Louis advertised his own "steineroo," which Louis calls "the Buckaroo." Louis repeatedly refers to his new mug as "the very best steineroo," Harper is furious that Louis is using Harper's term, the "Steineroo," to advertise Luis' "Buckaroo." Which of the following is most likely to occur? O Louis will be found to have infringed on Harper's trademark. O Louis will be found to have NOT infringed because Harper's protection lapsed. O Louis will be found to have infringed on Harper's trade secret. O Louis will be found to have NOT infringed because his product is sufficiently distinct. O Louis will be found to have infringed on Harper's patent