Question
Harry and Sue were the joint registered proprietors of an estate in fee simple of Blackacre as tenants-in-common. Consequently, at common law: a) Harry and
Harry and Sue were the joint registered proprietors of an estate in fee simple of Blackacre as tenants-in-common. Consequently, at common law:
a) Harry and Sue must be tenants-in-common in equal shares;
b) Harry and Sue must be tenants-in-common in unequal shares;
c) Harry and Sue could be tenants-in-common in either equal or unequal shares, in this example;
d) Harry and Sue as tenants-in-common cannot co-exist as the joint proprietors of an estate in fee simple where the shares are unspecified, and therefore are at law joint tenants with an undivided moiety.
Then If Harry and Sue are joint tenants of an estate in fee simple then:
a) they only share equally the equitable interest; .
b) they equally share both the legal and equitable interests;
c) the legal and equitable interests are merged in them equally;
d) they are able to legally satisfy unity of possession, interest, title, and time.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started