Hasbro, Inc. v$.$ Internet Entertainment Group, Ltd$\mathrm{.}1996$ WL $84853(1996)$United States District Court, Western District of Washington Hasbro, Inc., the maker of Candy, a childrens board game, owns the Candy Land trademark. A sexually explicit Internet site was hosted on candyland.com by Brian Cartmell and Internet Entertainment Group, Ltd$.$ The site was accessible to anyone by searching for "candyland". To prevent the defendants from using the CANDYLAND trademark, Hasbro filed a trademark dilution lawsuit in federal court. Does the defendants' use of the word candyland in connection with a sexually explicit Web site violate Hasbro's trademark rights? In fact, yes. A permanent injunction was granted to Hasbro and the defendants were ordered to stop using the CANDYLAND trademark and remove all content from candyland.com. In affirmative. According to the United States District Court, Hasbro demonstrated irreparable harm from the defendants' use of the CANDYLAND mark and the domain name candyland.com. Hasbro had proven that there was a chance of winning its lawsuit alleging that the defendants' actions broke the federal and Washington statutes prohibiting trademark dilution. "Defendants will not suffer any inconvenience if they are required to cease using the CANDYLAND name; the probable harm to Hasbro from their conduct outweighs." Chapter $38$