Hastie and Dawes suggest that no story at all is better than a weak story when defending a client in jury cases. Based on the interview with the Ohio defense attorneys, which statement is correct about omitting a story? Group of answer choices Omitting a story is a bad strategy, but only for criminal cases Omitting a story is almost always a good strategy Omitting a story is a good strategy, but only for criminal cases Omitting a story is almost always a bad strategy