have no idea with this. is there any points need to be included when answer

In May 2016 US pharmaceutical company Pfizer Inc. announced it would no longer supply US state authorities with the drugs that the authorities had been using to carry out lethal injections on US death row prisoners. The company announced: that it had imposed sweeping controls on the distribution of its products to ensure that none are used in lethal injections, a step that closes off the last remaining open-market source of drugs used in executions. More than 20 American and European drug companies have already adopted such restrictions, citing either moral or business reasons. Nonetheless, the decision from one of the world's leading pharmaceutical manufacturers is seen as a milestone. "With Pfizer's announcement, all F.D.A.-approved manufacturers of any potential execution drug have now blocked their sale for this purpose," said Maya Foa, who tracks drug companies for Reprieve, a London-based human rights advocacy group. "Executing states must now go underground if they want to get hold of medicines for use in lethal injection. (Source: New York Times, May 13 2016) Imagine you are an accountant at Pfizer's headquarters in New York, USA. You come to suspect that even after the statement above the company has taken steps to secretly continue selling the drugs in question to some US states. Accessing files that you are not technically permitted to access (although it is an open secret' that accounting staff in your department sometimes need to do this as part of their work) you discover that the company has set up an offshore subsidiary to continue selling these drugs to the governments in question, despite making such a public announcement that they would no longer do so and gaining praise from human rights campaigners. You decide to speak to your immediate supervisor about this. She is surprised at what you have found but implies that you should not take the issue further or tell anyone else about it, arguing that the company may as well make money from this supply avenue 'since if we don't , someone else will. Besides, she says, if the governments don't have a safe and legitimate supply they will be forced to buy drugs underground or use experimental drugs and the outcomes for death row inmates could be terrible' What might be the right thing to do in this situation? What will you do