Having been helped by her beloved nephew, young Derek, in crossing the street one day, Sydney, a small, elderly woman who Derek knew was quite poor with not a dime in the bank, gave Derek a deed to a parcel of land she said she owned in uptown Manhattan near Central Park in New York City. Derek thanked Sydney profusely, but then said "Auntie, you know you don't own any property in New York City, why don't you take this back." She yelled at him, getting upset, and said, "Yes I do, young whipper-snapper. Now take it, I want you to have it!" He took the deed and put it in his pocket, but when he brought his beloved Auntie back to his house where she lived with him, Derek said in a very condescending tone of voice; "Again, thank you, Auntie so much for this generous gift that I am sure is worth millions of dollars. I'll leave this deed right here on your dresser, for safe keeping." Aunt Sydney died soon thereafter, without a will, and without a dime in the bank. At the funeral, Sydney's long lost son, Matthew, who had a very bad relationship with his mother, showed up, asking about the property his mother owned in uptown Manhattan, which he had known about for years but had agreed with his mother to keep secret from the rest of the family. An action has been filed in the probate court asking for a declaratory judgment regarding title to the land in upper Manhattan in New York City, valued at millions of dollars by the court. What is the mostly likely response from the court?