Heather and Amanda decide to go Spuds, etc. after class so they can drink soda, eat potatoes, and discuss with one another how much they love Law-201. Feeling generous, Amanda decides to pay for both of them. When they sit down Heather pours some of her soda into a cup and drinks it...it was delicious. A few minutes later, Heather pours the remainder of the can into the cup and is disgusted to see that the body of a dead spider had been in the can. Heather promptly vomits. visits the Emergency Room, and then calls her attorney. Under modern (current) legal theory, Heather will not be able to bring a viable negligence claim against the manufacturer of the soda because it was Spuds, etc. that purchased the soda from the manufacturer and not Heather. True False QUESTION 24 Which of the following would probably describe a situation in which a legal duty of care exists between the parties? (Choose all correct answers) A parent who observes their child drowning A manufacturer of an automobile that explodes during a minor fender-bender, severely injuring the occupants of both vehicles A lifeguard at a public pool who observes an adult drowning. An olympic gold medalist swimmer who observes his neighbor drowning (they are not related). None of the above