Hello can you please help me form a question using the following format "what do you think will happen if?" and also provide an answer. The question must be based from the text below

Inreaseeasron or Tasarsrem'rs By their very nature, the \"treatments" in a measur- atiye experiment [Exam ple 2} usually are isolated from each other in space andfor time. In contrast, treatments in a manipulative experiment always must be inter spersed with each other in space and time. This inter- spersionr'isolation criterion is the principal operational distinction between the two types of experiments. In many, perhaps most kinds of manipulative err- pcriments, adequate in terspersion of treatments results more or less automatically when experimenta] units are assigned to treatments by randomization proce- dures. However, in some ways, interspersion is the more critical concept or feature; randomization is sim- ply a any of achieving interspersion in a way that elim- inates the possibility of bias and allows accurate spec~ ication of the probability of a type I error. Also, for preliminary assessment of the adequacy oferrperimen- ta] designs, interspersion is a more practical criterion than is randomization. The latter refers only to the process, but the former suggests what the physical lay- out of the experiment should look titre, roughly how the experimental units should be distributed in space. Example 4. We return to our l-m isohath to test whether oak. {Quercus} leaves will decompose more rapidly than will maple {Ace-r} leaves at that depth. This will be a manipulative experiment. though our operations in the eld Will be very similar to those of our earlier mensurative experiments (Examples 2. 3}. Now we are actually altering a single variable {species} and not just comparing a system property at two points in space or time. We place eight bags of maple leaves at random with- in a IEILS-m2 plot {A} on the lm isobath and eight bags of oak leaves at random within a second \"identical" plot {B} contiguous to the rst one. Because the treat- ments are segregated and not interspersed. this is an uninteresting experiment. The only hypothesis testEd by it is that maple leaves at loCation A decay at a different rate than do oak leaves at location B. The supposed \"identicalness\" of the two plots almost cer- tainly does not exist. and the experiment is not con trolled for the possibility that the seemingly small ini- tial dissimilarities between the two plots will have an inuenoe on decomposition rate. Nor is it controlled for the possibility of nondemonic intrusion. i.e.. the possibility that an uncontrolled extraneous inuence or chanoe event during the experiment could increase the dissimilarity of the two plots. Example 5. We use eight leal' bags for each species and distribute them all at random within the some plot on the lm isobath. This experiment will allow us val- idly to test whether the two species decompose at the same rate at this location. If our interest is primarily in a comparison of the two species. we may Feel this experiment is sufcient. and it is. However. if it is important to us to state how the two species' rates compare on the im r'sobnrh. then we should carry out an experiment in which both sets of leaves are dis- persed over two or more randomly selected points on the lm isobath. Also. if we wish to generalize to the l-m isobaths of a certain class of lakes, obviously two sets ofleat" bags must be distributed in some randomv ized fashion over all or a random sample of these lakes. The appropriate dispersion of replicates is as important in manipulative as in mensurative experiments