Hello class, from the given study we can find out that many of the experiments such as those are mentioned in the above given study like milgram obedience study, Little albert etc resulted to be unethical by impacting in a bad way on the other hand there are many of the experiments which went good and followed proper ethics.

In this study, the main highlighted part is to explain how the roles performed socially can be a bad impact on someone's life, in this study it is taught that the experts should also keep in mind to work ethically and treat well to the people so they should not get harmed.

Well the negative impact intheLittleAlbertexperiment,forexample,achild'sterrorreactionwasusedtoillustratetheconceptsofconditioning. Nonetheless,theintentionalinstillationofdreadinLittleAlbertwithouthisknowledgeorconsentmadethisstudyunethical.

Coming towards the morals used for the justification are unethical way adopted to perform the experiments which had caused harm to the participants and moreover there was less encouragement.

REF:

Paul, C., & Brookes, B. (2015). The Rationalization of Unethical Research: Revisionist Accounts of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the New Zealand "Unfortunate Experiment". American Journal of Public Health, 105(10), e12-e19.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302720

SciShow. (2016, September 11).5 psychology experiments you couldn't do today[Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ3l1jgmYrY.

Youngpeter, K. (2008). Controversial psychological research methods and their influence on the development of formal ethical guidelines.Student Journal of Psychological Science, 1(1), 4-12.https://online225.psych.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/225-Master/225-UnitPages/Unit-10/Youngpeter_StudentJournal_2008.pdf\.

Please provide a brief and comprehensive response to this post with IN-TEXT Citations. Thanks!