Hello, I am wondering if it is possible identify the following requirement/criteria for the paper(Eckstein et al., 2023.pdf; and Guoynes & Marler, 2023.pdf).

Identify thehypothesis(ses), variables, predictions, summary of findings and limitations. Also whetherthe abstract accurately reflects a) what was done and b) what was found.

It is not directly comparing/contrasting the papers but rather, critically "mining" the papers for the required information.

#1: use "my" definition of hypothesis vs prediction. It may or may not align with what the authors do in their paper

#2: When reporting the finding, do not report statistical numbers. Rather, what relationships were found among the variables (e.g., x caused y).

#3: Have the authors missed anything that you think is important?

Requirements:

• For EACH of the 2 assigned papers, explicitly state the hypothesis(ses), predictions, and experimental variables. Then provide a brief summary of the findings as well as the limitations/confounds. Finally, comment on whether the abstract accurately reflects what you found in the rest of the paper.

it would be really helpful, Thank you!