Hello, I could use some help with an assignment. I filled in what I thought the answers are. Just looking for feedback to see if I am on the right track. Thanks in advance!

1.Use Am. Jur. 2d

a.Which title and section deal with the capacity of parties, generally, to enter into partnerships?

Partnership; 59A Am. Jur. 2d Partnership 39or 46?

Title IV (A) ?

b.Review the sections to which you are directed. May married persons be partners with each other?

Yes. 59A Am Jur 2dPartnership 42

2.Use Am. Jur. 2d

a.Which title and section deal with larceny of trade secrets?

Larceny 62

b.What case states that, at common law, trade secrets were not recognized as a subject of larceny?

Com. v. Engleman, 336 Mass. 66, 142 N.E.2d 406 (1957)

c.What is the citation for the National Stolen Property Act?

18 U.S.C.A. 2314

3.Use C.J.S.

a.Which topic and section discuss injuries by dogs to persons as a result of rabies?

CJS ANIMALS 372

b.Read the section.Is a dog owner liable for the death of an animal or person by his rabid dog if the owner does not know of the vicious propensity of the dog and has no reason to know if it is suffering from rabies?Does it make a difference if the dog is trespassing?What case governs your answer?

No, the owner is not liable. It does not matter if the dog was trespassing. Adogowner who does not know of the vicious propensities of his or herdogbefore the appearance of therabies, and does not know and has no reason to believe that thedogis suffering fromrabies, is not liable for the death of an animal orpersonbitten by thedogand contracting the disease5even though thedogat the time of theinjurywas trespassing6and in violation of a municipal ordinance.

Case that governs my answer is Van Etten v. Noyes, 128 A.D. 406, 112 N.Y.S. 888 (4th Dep't 1908).

4.Use Am. Jur. Proof of Facts (3d)

a.Give the citation to an article relating to dentists, dentistry, and dental injuries with regard to plastic veneers.

11 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 1 (Originally published in 1991)

b.Review the article.What does section 49 provide?

49.Defendant to plaintiffInterrogatories

The interrogatories in this section pertain to an action by aninjured person to recover damages forinjuries to the plaintiff's teeth as a result of some negligent or intentional act by the defendant (exclusive of medical ordental malpractice).

c.Who authored the article?

L. Anne Hirschel, D.D.S.

5.Restatement (Second) of Contracts.

a.What section discusses the "the mailbox rule"

63;Restatement (Second) of Contracts 63 (1981)

b.With regard to comment a, what Florida case discusses the rationale for the mailbox rule?

Morrison v. Thoelke, 155 So.2d 889 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1963)

6.ALR.

a.What article discusses drive-in theaters as a public nuisance for showing obscene movies?

92 A.L.R.5th 593 (Originally published in 2001) ALR5th Rachel Piven-Kehrle, J.D.?" Nudity as ConstitutingNuisance"

or

50 A.L.R.3d 969 (Originally published in 1973)ALR3d

Jack W. Shaw, Jr., J.D. ?"Exhibition of obscene motion pictures as nuisance"

I am not sure if either of these answer'sare correct

b.When was the article originally published?

Depending on the answer above (2001)or (1973)?

c.What section contains the definition of obscenity?

3?