hello I need help reply to this please (Chelesea)

I believe that Big Tug is right. As soon as the incident happened Big Tug conducted interviews of all the witnesses in anticipation of a lawsuit. Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) Big Tug is covered because it applies to documents and other things collected in preparation for litigation or trial. Also Big Tug is cover by the Work Product Doctrine which simple states that work produced by a lawyer or their agent to include research memorandum, witness interviews, or notes resulting from other investigations. Mrs. Sadd's attorney would have to conduct their own interviews and investigation into the incident to gather what they would need to move ahead with their lawsuit of Big Tug.