Hello, I need help with the following question. A two page position papers for the issue outlined below. So please make sure that the position paper is least two pages for the issue stated below. Your writing can be arguing for either position, for or against. A brief position paper as if you were submitting written submissions for a debate on the topic either supporting or opposing The Question, and providing as compelling an argument as possible to support the position that you adopt. Be as brief as you feel is appropriate while properly analyzing the relevant issue and developing your arguments, but not so brief as to miss out on important nuances in your answer.

Issue 1: Modernization of the Evidentiary Standard and Rules in Canadian Sexual Assault

Law

Background: The "#Me Too" movement has had a profound impact on Canadian society and the law of sexual assault over the past two years. Interest groups have invested significant money buying billboards simply delivering the message "I Believe You" in direct reference to the victims of sexual assault. The criminal law standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt has historically made it very difficult to attain a conviction for sexual assault without third party or physical corroborating evidence. Read the article from the Globe & Mail "Supreme Court sends signal to appellate courts on sexual assault rulings" from Dec 14/20, which is posted in Blackboard under "Course Content- Other Materials", which makes it clear that the Supreme Court of Canada is intentionally changing Canadian sexual assault law to make it more likely that sexual assault charges will result in convictions.

The Question: BE IT RESOLVED that the historical interpretation in Canadian law of what is required to establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt was biased against complainants and that the pro-complainant modifications being implemented by the Supreme Court of Canada represent a necessary and positive change in modern society in light of the #Me Too movement.