hello, i wrote this essay and i would like for you to check it. There are a lot of unnecessary parts and repeated parts. can you please fix them/ combine them to make it in to a nice proper essay. if you feel like i could add more things to it tell me and i will search for it, but for now please fix it. thank you

this is the essay question : Scholars such as Edgar Schein and Geert Hofstede argued that contemporary managers must have an awareness of culture. write words and using relevant scholarly sources discuss the ways in which management thinkers have attempted to understand culture.

this is the essay:

Introduction

In today's globalized world, cultural understanding is paramount as organizations operate in increasingly diverse and interconnected environments. As businesses expand across borders and workforces become increasingly diverse, managers must possess the knowledge and skills to navigate different cultural norms, values, and practices. Failure to do so can lead to misunderstandings and conflict and ultimately hinder organizational success. Scholars like Edgar Schein and Geert Hofstede have significantly contributed to this area, offering frameworks illuminating organizational culture's complexities and cross-cultural interactions. This essay discusses the significance of cultural understanding in modern management practices, focusing on Schein's model of organizational culture and Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory. By examining these frameworks, we will explore how they provide managers with essential tools to navigate cultural complexities, foster inclusive environments, and drive organizational success. Finally, this essay will argue that a nuanced understanding of culture is vital for contemporary managers looking to succeed in the globalized business landscape.

Edgar Schein's Model

Edgar Schein proposed a model of organizational culture consisting of three levels: artefacts and behaviours, espoused values, and underlying assumptions (Chen & Corritore, 2008). At the surface level are artefacts and behaviours, encompassing tangible aspects like physical layout, dress code, language, and observable actions (Chen & Corritore, 2008). Espoused values, the next level, comprise stated beliefs often found in mission and vision statements or formal policies (Chen & Corritore, 2008). The deepest level, underlying assumptions, holds the core beliefs guiding individuals' decisions within the organization, typically taken for granted and seldom questioned (Chen & Corritore, 2008).

Schein's model underscores the formation of organizational culture through shared learning among members, sustained over time via socialization, wherein cultureis passed downfrom one generation of employees to the next (Chen & Corritore, 2008). This model emphasizes that organizational culture operates on multiple levels, from the visible to the subconscious, shaping behaviours and decisions within the workplace (Chen & Corritore, 2008).

Schein's model of organizational culture is highly relevant to modern management practices, offering a framework for comprehending and managing the intangible aspects of organizations. Its significance encompasses various dimensions: Firstly, it assists managers in understanding the importance of aligning an organization's professed values with its underlying assumptions, thereby fostering cultural alignment and cohesion within the organization (Busco & Scapens, 2011). Secondly, the model highlights the essential role of addressing underlying assumptions during change management initiatives, emphasizing the need for a deep understanding and challenge of these assumptions for successful change implementation. Thirdly, Schein's model informs recruitment and selection processes by enabling managers to evaluate potential employees' cultural fit based on their professed values and underlying assumptions, ensuring alignment with the organization's culture. Lastly, the model underscores the significance of leadership in shaping and transmitting organizational culture, emphasizing the influence leaders wield in moulding the culture within their teams and throughout the organization (Busco & Scapens, 2011). Schein's model provides managers with a systematic approach to managing organizational culture, making it highly relevant to contemporary management practices.

In contemporary management practices, Schein's model of organizational culture finds relevance due to its systematic approach to comprehending and managing the intricate and intangible aspects of organizational dynamics. Beyond merely understanding culture, the model facilitates effective management strategies. Firstly, it emphasizes aligning espoused values with underlying assumptions to foster organizational coherence and effectiveness (Busco & Scapens, 2011). Secondly, by highlighting the importance of addressing underlying assumptions during change initiatives, the model guides successful implementation by acknowledging and challenging entrenched beliefs. Thirdly, it aids in recruitment and selection processes by enabling managers to assess the cultural compatibility of potential hires, ensuring organizational cohesion. Lastly, the model underscores the pivotal role of leadership in shaping organizational culture, emphasizing leaders' influence in fostering desired cultural norms and behaviours (Busco & Scapens, 2011). In sum, Schein's model offers a structured approach to managing organizational culture, aligning it with contemporary management practices and enhancing organizational effectiveness in today's dynamic business environment.

Geert Hofstede's cultural dimension

Geert Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory proposes six dimensions for comparing and understanding cultural differences across countries (Wu, 2006). Power distance measures the extent to which less powerful members of a society accept and expect unequal power distribution, with high power distance cultures endorsing hierarchy and authority. In contrast, low power distance cultures advocate equality and collaboration. Individualism versus collectivism gauges whether individuals prioritize personal goals over collective ones, with collectivist cultures valuing harmony and loyalty and individualistic cultures emphasizing personal achievement and autonomy. Masculinity versus femininity emphasizes assertiveness, material success versus caring for others, and work-life balance.

Uncertainty avoidance reflects a society's comfort with ambiguity and risk, with high uncertainty avoidance cultures preferring stability and rules, while low uncertainty avoidance cultures are more accepting of change. Long-term versus short-term orientation measures a culture's focus on long-term planning and persistence versus short-term goal achievement and immediate needs fulfilment. Indulgence versus restraint gauges a society's allowance for the gratification of basic desires, with restrained cultures emphasizing self-control and indulgent cultures prioritizing freedom and enjoyment (Wu, 2006).

Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory has significantly influenced managerial approaches to cross-cultural interactions. It assists managers in understanding fundamental differences in values and behaviours among cultures, enabling them to anticipate and navigate potential clashes and misunderstandings (Wu, 2006). Furthermore, the theory suggests adapting leadership styles according to cultural contexts; for instance, autocratic leadership may be more accepted in high power distance cultures, while in low power distance cultures, a participatory and democratic style maybe preferred. Managers can enhance their effectiveness by adjusting their leadership approaches accordingly.

Moreover, Hofstede's dimensions serve as a framework for designing cross-cultural training programs tailored to employees working in diverse cultures. Managers can enhance cultural competence and minimize misunderstandings by focusing on relevant dimensions. Additionally, understanding cultural dimensions aids in assessing negotiation styles, decision-making processes, and communication preferences across cultures, allowing managers to adapt their approaches for greater effectiveness. Lastly, the theory informs managerial decisions regarding international expansion and market entry, enabling anticipation of cultural barriers and tailored strategies for success. Overall, Hofstede's theory equips managers with valuable insights to navigate and manage cross-cultural interactions, fostering collaboration and success in diverse cultural contexts (Hofsteds,1980).

Methodological Approaches and Frameworks

There are several frameworks available to assess cultural elements within organizational settings. Edgar Schein emphasized the importance of organizational culture as a collection of shared beliefs acquired through addressing external adaptation and internal integration challenges. He stressed that it must be effectively applied and communicated to new members (Schein, 1990). Geert Hofstede developed a theory which outlines six dimensions of culture. These dimensions are power distance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term versus short-term orientation, and indulgence versus restraint. This theory facilitates comparison between different cultures (Hofstede, 1980). Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner created the Seven Dimensions of Culture framework. This model emphasizes different dimensions of culture, such as universalism versus particularism and individualism versus communitarianism. The aim of developing this model was to study cultural differences (Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner, 1997).

The effectiveness and applicability of cultural assessment tools vary by context. Hofstede's framework is helpful for global businesses to understand cultural differences across countries, but it may need to be more balanced within-country diversities. (Hofstede, 1980). The model developed by Schein examines how organizational culture influences behaviour and decision-making, which makes it crucial for analyzing the internal workings of an organization (Schein, 1990). The Seven Dimensions of Culture by Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner thoroughly examines cultural disparities. However, their complexity might make them difficult to apply directly in some situations.(Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner, 1997).

Managers can enhance team management and global market expansion by preparing for cross-cultural interactions using cultural assessment methodologies such as Hofstede's dimensions (Hofstede, 2001). Schein's understanding of organizational culture guides leaders and promotes collaboration and inclusivity when implementing organizational change. (Schein, 2010). The model developed by Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner advocates for an adaptable management style, emphasizing the importance of recognizing varying cultural viewpoints in decision-making procedures. (Trompenaars & Woolliams, 2003).

Evolution and cultural frameworks in management

Theoretical frameworks havebeen developedto address global cultural diversity in response to the changing dynamics of the global business environment. In the beginning, many frameworks focused on comparing national cultures, as seen in Geert Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory, which primarily examined cultural differences between countries. However, as globalization intensified and organizations becamemore diverse, there was a growing recognition of the need for frameworks accounting for cultural diversity within nations and across organizations. Scholars have developed nuanced models that acknowledge the complexity of cultural identities and interactions. One such model is Edward T. Hall's concept of high-context versus low-context cultures, which provides a new dimension to understanding communication styles beyond national boundaries. This model highlights the significance of non-verbal cues, implicit communication, and contextual understanding in intercultural interactions (Hall, 1976). In addition, modern frameworks like Erin Meyer's Culture Mapare designedto incorporate various aspects of culture, such as communication styles, leadership methods, and decision-making processes. Meyer's model highlights the ever-changing dynamics of cultural interactions and the importance of ongoing adjustment and education in cross-cultural situations (Meyer, 2014).

Although theoretical frameworks havebeen developedto acknowledge the complexity of cultural identities, they have limitations in capturing the entire range of cultural diversity. Many frameworks still depend on generalizations and stereotypes that can oversimplify or essentialize cultural differences, ignoring individual variations and hybrid identities within multiethnic contexts. Some frameworks may emphasize specific cultural dimensions more than others, which could lead to the neglect of less visible aspects of culture that are equally influential in shaping behaviour and attitudes. For instance, Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory mainly concentrates on value orientations associated with work and social norms. However, it may only partially represent the diversity of cultural expressions in fields like art, music, and spirituality. In addition, it can be challenging to create frameworks that categorize and compare cultural differences because culture is constantly changing. Social, economic, and technological shifts contribute to the dynamic nature of culture, making it hard to develop fixed frameworks that remain relevant over time. Although theoretical frameworks have limitations, they are still helpful in promoting cultural diversity and can provide valuable insights into cross-cultural interactions. However, managers must recognize and supplement these limitations with qualitative research and contextual understanding.Thiscan help managers develop more nuanced approaches to managing organizational cultural diversity.

There is an increasing focus on cultural awareness in management education and leadership development. Many business schools and training programs now offer courses or modules on cross-cultural management, which equip students with knowledge about various cultural frameworks and skills to effectively navigate cultural diversity in the workplace. Many leadership development programs include cultural awareness training to equip future leaders with the skills to manage diverse teams and operate in global markets. This training often involves experiential learning activities, case studies, and simulations that expose participants to real-world cultural challenges and encourage reflective practice. Furthermore, organizations' leaders emphasize cultural competence as a critical skill.Thisinvolves recognizing cultural differences and showing compassion, understanding, and flexibility in interactions with people from different cultures. Companies may offer continuous training and assistance to leaders to help them enhance these abilities and cultivate inclusive workplaces that embrace diverse viewpoints. Integrating cultural awareness in management education and leadership development is essential for preparing future leaders to thrive in an increasingly diverse and globalized world.

Critiques and Limitations

Due to their limitations and challenges, the cultural models developed by Edgar Schein and Geert Hofstede have been criticized. Critics have accused them of overgeneralizing cultures by constraining them to static dimensions, which may overlook the complexity of organizational cultural expressions. This approach can lead to a one-dimensional understanding of culture, ignoring the interconnections and dynamic nature of different cultural components.

The models have a Western bias because theywere mainly createdin Western countries.Thiscan result in misunderstandings in non-Western environments. Additionally, the models portray cultures as unchanging, with underlying presumptions remaining consistent over time. As a result, this can result in inaccurate generalizations about cultural beliefs and principles.

Hofstede's cultural dimensions may require more precision to account for the diversity of cultures within regions and countries, as it may overlook certain subcultures or geographic differences among nations.Thiscould lead to inaccurate conclusions about cultural values and norms based on overly broad generalizations.

The consideration of contextualization is an important matter that these models need to address. A culture is strongly linked to its unique surroundings, influenced by social organization, past events, and power relations. The absence of context could lead to oversimplification in comprehending cultural phenomena and impede the progress of cross-cultural management approaches.

Some individuals believe that other viewpoints, such as cultural hybridity, critical cultural studies, and contextual embeddedness, provide more intricate understandings of culture by taking into account power dynamics, inequalities, and oppositions within and outside of cultures. These perspectives stress the significance of recognizing culture within particular contexts and the effects of contextual factors on cultural interactions.

Effective management practices of the future should involve embracing diverse cultural perspectives, adopting a flexible approach that acknowledges the ever-changing nature of cultures, and demonstrating contextual sensitivity. To successfully manage cultural variances, managers should adopt a dynamic approach, recognizing the complexity of ethnic identities and traditions and addressing different cultural groups' diverse demands and tastes. They should also be mindful of the unique cultural environments in which businesses operate, avoiding simplistic generalizations and biases. Inclusive leadership that values diversity, cultivates cultural awareness, and facilitates open communication is essential for managing cultural differences. This approach promotes collaboration and partnership among people from diverse cultural backgrounds, creating a welcoming culture that celebrates diversity and promotes equity.

Practical Implications for Managers

Managers wield invaluable tools in the form of cultural frameworks to navigate the complexities of today's globalized business landscape. Edgar Schein's model offers a profound lens into organizational culture, emphasizing its multi-layered nature, from surface-level artefacts to deeply ingrained assumptions. By applying Schein's model, managers can align professed values with underlying beliefs, facilitating cultural coherence within their organizations. Additionally, Schein's emphasis on addressing underlying assumptions during change initiatives underscores the importance of understanding and challenging entrenched beliefs for successful implementation.

Geert Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory further enriches managers' understanding of cross-cultural interactions. Through dimensions like power distance and uncertainty avoidance, managers gain insights into fundamental cultural differences in values and behaviours. This understanding enables them to adapt leadership styles and tailor management approaches to cultural contexts, fostering effective communication and collaboration across diverse teams. Furthermore, Hofstede's framework is a foundation for designing cross-cultural training programs, equipping employees with the cultural competence necessary for success in today's globalized marketplace.

In integrating these frameworks into real-world scenarios, managers can cultivate cultural intelligence and competence essential for navigating diverse cultural dynamics. Whether expanding into new markets, negotiating partnerships, or leading organizational change, a nuanced understanding of cultural frameworks empowers managers to make informed decisions and foster inclusive environments. By embracing continuous learning, cross-cultural exposure, and promoting inclusive leadership practices, managers can harness the transformative potential of cultural diversity, driving organizational success in an ever-evolving global landscape.

Conclusion

Overall, the significance of cultural understanding in contemporary management focuses on two prominent frameworks - Edgar Schein's model of organizational culture and Geert Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory. The discussion emphasized how these frameworks equip managers with the tools to navigate cultural complexities, create inclusive environments, and ultimately drive organizational success. Managers can effectively lead diverse teams and operate in global markets by aligning professed values with underlying assumptions and utilizing Hofstede's cultural dimensions to compare cultural differences. It is clear that cultural understanding plays a pivotal role in shaping effective management practices in the global context, and it is imperative for managers to cultivate such understanding for the benefit of their organizations.

Cultural understanding is crucial for managers in today's diverse business landscape. Those who possess cultural intelligence and competence are better equipped to navigate the complexities of the workplace. Organizations that embrace cultural diversity and promote inclusive leadership practices can leverage their talent pool and foster innovation, creativity, and collaboration. The need for cultural understanding will only intensify as the world becomes increasingly interconnected. Thus, continuous learning and adaptation in managerial practices are essential for success.

Several areas for future research or inquiry in cultural understanding and management emerge; new trends such as virtual teamwork, cross-cultural leadership development, and the impact of globalization on organizational culture present ripe opportunities for exploration. Additionally, further research could delve into the nuances of cultural interactions within specific industries or regions and the role of technology in facilitating cross-cultural communication and collaboration. By addressing these gaps and exploring new frontiers, researchers and practitioners can continue to enhance our understanding of cultural dynamics and their implications for effective management in an ever-evolving global landscape.