Hello, please help me to digest the cases. Thank you.
10. 11. In an ejectment suit, the tenant interposed the defense of social justice to resist the ejectment case led against him on the ground of non-payment of rentals. Is the contention correct? (Salonga vs. Farales. 105 SCRA 359) Fidel Gotangco has been employed with the Philippine Airlines for 18 years. One day, as he was preparing to go home, he was inspected by one of the company guards who saw a piece of lead pipe in his possession belonging to the company. Fidel readily admitted that he was bringing the pipe home for his personal use. He was meted a Preventive suspension and later dismissed. Is the Constitutional mandate on social justice can be considered tojustify the decision of Philippine Airlines? (PAI vs. PALEA; Qaganvs. NLRC, GR. 106454, Oct. 21,1993) Emiliano Jurado wrote in his column about a decision of the Supreme Court regarding a case which the coLIrt allegedly decided. When asked for his source, he could not state the same, especially since the decision has not yet been promulgated. When pressed for it, he invoked is right of information on matters of public concern. ls his contention proper? Madam Chikadora, a member of the Board of Motion Pictures wanted to know how other members voted in a particular lm. The Chairman refused to reveal the result. Madam Chikadora invoked her right to access on matters of public concern. ls Madam Chikadora entitle to such constitutional right? (Ma. Carmen vs. Morato, G. R. 92541, Nov. 13, 1991). The seamen, upon instruction from Manila were made to disembark in Argentina and sent home to Manila. Prior to disembarkation they were given an audience by the Captain although no explanation was given. Upon arrival in Manila the company head saw them and told them the reason for being sent home. Was there violation of due process? (Tingson, Jr. vs. NLRC, G.R. 84702, May 18, 1990) Ordinance No. 4964 of Manila reads: \"it shall be prohibited for any operator of any bather shop to conduct the business of massaging customers or other persons in any adjacent room or rooms of said barber shop, or in any room or rooms within the same building where the barber shop is located as long as the operator of the barber shop and the rooms where massaging is conducted is the same person.\" Does this amount to deprivation of property without due processg (Velasco vs. Mayor \\llegas, G.R. 24153, February 14, 1983) Does PT&T's company policy 0f not accepting or considering as disqualied from work any woman worker who contracts marriage violate women's right against discrimination afforded by the Constitution? (PT&T vs. NLRC, GR. 116978, May 23, 1997) Does Section 2 of the Bill of Rights protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures perpetrated by private individuals? (People vs. Marti, G. R, 81561, January 18, 1991) A search warrant for the newspaper "WE FORUM" is issued on the basis of a broad statement of the military that Burgos, Jr. "is in possession or has in his control printing equipment and other paraphernalia, news publications and other documents which were used and are all continuously being used as a means of committing the offense of subversion." is such allegation sufcient to establish probable cause? (Burgos, Sr. vs. Chief of Staff, AFP, 133 SCRA 800, December 26, 1984) Grin Honas has been charged with rebellion complexed with murder and the facts constituting the offense are set down in the information. Grin contends that since rebellion may not be complexed with murder, he is charged with a non-existing crime. Is the contention tenable? (EELS. vs. Judge Salazar, G.R. 92163, June 5, 1990) Accused 'Alyas Pogi' had be convicted of arson by Judge Simangot who had attributed to the accused the desire to destroy evidence of malversation as the motive for arson. The same judge is now trying the accused for the same malversation. Should the judge disqualify herself (Ignacio vs. Villaluz, 90 SCRA 16, May 5, 1979)
