Hello

Topic: The Search, Seizure and False Arrest: Examining Fourth Amendment Remedies when Police Plants Evidence. I will also explore the analysis of the implications on the fourth amendment in regards to warrants and marigrates.

This is for capstone 699, this is the final paper and time is running out to submit the paper. I have been working hard on the paper. I am really concerned about the paper. Could you please assist with these case briefs?

1. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) - State courts are the ones that use the Exclusionary Rule. 2. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) - The practice of stopping and searching people. 3. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) - Stop and frisk procedures. 4. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) - The search that took place as a result of the arrest was restricted to the area that was immediately under the suspect's control. 5. California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991) - An exemption from the requirement of a warrant is provided for automobiles. 6. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) - The exclusionary rule does not apply in cases when good faith is demonstrated. 7. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987) - The need of probable cause in addition to the plain view theory. 8. United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012) - Both the tracking by GPS and a reasonable expectation of privacy are problematic. 9. Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014) - Cell phone searches conducted during an arrest need to be authorized by a warrant. 10. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) - The totality of the circumstances test is used to determine whether or not to issue search warrants. 11. Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013) - A search is performed when a dog is allowed to sniff at the front door. 12. Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006) - There are no regulations for knocking or knocking and announcing. 13. Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429 (1991) - Consent to be searched on buses being given voluntarily. 14. United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) - During the course of an arrest, a search of the car and its occupants was conducted. 15. Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009) - Both the attenuation doctrine and the exclusionary rule are in play here.

16. Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58 (1967) - Evidence that was fabricated in the course of an illegal search and seizure. 17. People v. Watkins, 207 Ill. 2d 167 (2003) - During a search that was not authorized by a warrant, the police planted narcotics. 18. Turner v. City of Chicago, 298 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2002) - A fabricated arrest and the fabrication of evidence. 19. People v. Lee, 872 P.2d 1310 (Colo. 1994) - Evidence that was fabricated during the course of an arrest search. 20. Johnston v. City of East Moline, 577 F.3d 565 (7th Cir. 2009) - In violation of the Fourth Amendment and a wrongful arrest.

21. People v. Ross, 364 P.3d 491 (Cal. 2016) - A search warrant is required in order to enter and search a marijuana dispensary. 22. Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000) - Even if someone provides information concerning weapons or drugs, a person must have reasonable suspicion before they can be stopped and searched. 23. State v. Valdez, 118 N.M. 749 (1994) - Stopping a vehicle on suspicion of an infraction involving marijuana that requires reasonable suspicion is called for. 24. State v. Kabat, 839 N.W.2d 206 (Iowa 2013) - searches conducted legally and possession of marijuana. 25. Commonwealth v. Overmyer, 574 Pa. 389 (2003) - Extenuating circumstances and marijuana searches conducted without a warrant.

26. United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) - The use of a dog trained to detect drugs during a Terry stop. 27. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004) - During a Terry stop, it is obligatory to present some form of identification. 28. Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452 (2011) - Exigent conditions fabricated by the police and warrantless searches both took place. 29. Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975) - The attenuation doctrine and whether or not a confession was made voluntarily. 30. Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014) - During the traffic stop, the cops made a reasonable mistake of the law. 31. Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007) - During a traffic stop, the rights of passengers under the Fourth Amendment are protected. 32. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) - An exemption from the requirement of a warrant is provided for automobiles. 33. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971) - The doctrine and requirements should be readily apparent. 34. United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006) - Warrants for "anticipatory" searches and considerations under the Fourth Amendment. 35. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000) - Utilization of drug checkpoints and violations of the Fourth Amendment. 36. When v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) - Stopping drivers under false pretenses and the rights offered by the Fourth Amendment. 37. Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001) - An arrest made without a warrant for a very minor offense. 38. Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006) - Less intrusive searches of parolees and more respect for their rights under the Fourth Amendment. 39. California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986) - Keeping a reasonable expectation of privacy while conducting aerial surveillance. 40. Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) - searches of automobiles for safety purposes in accordance with the Fourth Amendment.

41. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) - Challenges to an unlawful arrest can be brought under Section 1983. 42. Wilkins v. May, 872 F.3d 391 (D.C. Cir. 2017) - False arrest and immunity from prosecution. 43. Johnson v. Baltimore City Police Dept., 481 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2007) - False arrest and qualified immunity. 44. Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356 (2012) - immunity for prosecutors and the manipulation of evidence are also issues. 45. Rivera v. Rhode Island, 402 F.3d 27 (1st Cir. 2005) -Allegations of false arrest and use of disproportionate force.