Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

HELP ANSWER PART F Problem 3: Looking to Buy A former NYU Stern Professor John (this one is a true story) recently asked for advice

HELP ANSWER PART F

Problem 3: Looking to Buy

A former NYU Stern Professor John (this one is a true story) recently asked for advice on purchasing a property in Massachusetts. He was looking at a property similar to 80 Captains Row, Bourne, MA 02532. Look up the 80 Captains Row property on Zillow. a) Notice that the zestimate Zillows best estimate of the house price jumps in July 2018. Can you figure out why Zillows formula to estimate prices would predict such a large increase? Do you think the variable that accounts for this increase should be in their formula to estimate the price?

The jump in Zillow's "Zestimate" for a property like 80 Captains Row, Bourne, MA 02532, in July 2018 could be due to several factors:

  1. Market Conditions: There might have been a significant increase in property values in that area during that time due to a strong real estate market, high demand, or other economic factors.
  2. Improvements or Renovations: The property may have undergone significant improvements or renovations, such as a kitchen remodel or an addition, which would increase its estimated value.
  3. Sales of Comparable Properties: The sale of similar properties in the neighborhood at higher prices could influence the Zestimate for this property.
  4. Data Updates: Zillow continually updates its data, and if it receives new data or corrected data for this property or the area, it could lead to a sudden adjustment in the Zestimate.

Whether the variable responsible for this increase should be included in Zillow's formula depends on the specific circumstances. If the jump in value was due to a temporary or unusual event, it may not be appropriate to include it as a permanent variable in the estimation formula. If the increase reflects a genuine change in the property's value that is likely to persist, then including it in the formula could lead to more accurate estimates.

b) Suppose that John put 20% down and paid $1.3m on the property. Using the estimate for 30 FRM rates you gathered earlier (in short question 2), estimate the monthly payment for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage on this property.

To estimate the monthly payment for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) on a $1.3 million property with a 20% down payment, you can use the formula for calculating the monthly payment of a fixed-rate mortgage:

MM - is the monthly payment.

PP - is the principal amount (80% of $1.3 million, which is $1,040,000).

Rr - is the monthly interest rate (annual rate divided by 12 months).

Nn - is the total number of payments (30 years * 12 months per year = 360 payments).

Estimate for the 30-year FRM rate you gathered earlier for Rr. Let us assume an annual interest rate of r = 3.5%/12

M=1,040,000 (0.002917(1+0.002917)360 / (1+0.002917)3601)

M $4,661.19

The estimated monthly payment for the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is approximately $4,661.19

c) Suppose that John has the money to pay for the property in cash, or get a mortgage. Factoring in the interest deduction (at a 37% tax bracket); how much will John have paid in total for the mortgage after 30 years?

Total Mortgage Payments = Monthly Payment * Total Number of Payments Total Mortgage Payments = $4,661.19 * 360 Total Mortgage Payments $1,679,928.40

d) If John could instead reinvest the cash somewhere else what rate of return would John need on the alternate investment for it to make sense to get the mortgage instead of paying fully in cash?

The mortgage cost is the total interest paid over 30 years, which you calculated in part (c) as approximately $1,679,928.40. Let us assume John can invest the cash elsewhere and expects an annual return rate of R%.

Future Value = Present Value * (1 + Rate of Return)^Number of Years

FutureValue=1,679,928.40(1+R100)30

Now, compare this future value to the expected return on the investment. John would be better off getting the mortgage if the expected rate of return on the investment is higher than the future value of the mortgage cost.

e) Suppose the property has a $14k/year flood insurance requirement if the property has a mortgage. How does your answer to d change?

If the property has a $14,000 per year flood insurance requirement due to having a mortgage, it would increase the total cost of owning the property with a mortgage. To incorporate this additional cost into the calculation from part (d), you would need to add the annual flood insurance cost to the mortgage cost for each year. Then, calculate the future value of this increased cost and compare it to the expected return on the investment. f) Should John get the mortgage?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Wealth Habits Six Ordinary Steps To Achieve Extraordinary Financial Freedom

Authors: Candy Valentino

1st Edition

1394152299, 978-1394152292

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Identify the types of informal reports.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Write messages that are used for the various stages of collection.

Answered: 1 week ago