Help answer the following questons. Was Mr. Willingham guilty ? Was there enough reasonable doubt to justify delaying the execution? Should convicted criminals be afforded the benefit of new scientific discoveries involving evidence analysis after their conviction? Or, should the convictions stand based on the science and evidence presented at the original trial regardless of new innovations within the scientific community? Did penal populism impact the Governor's decision go ahead with the execution?

https://www.pbs.org/video/frontline-death-by-fire/