Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Help correct answers. QU ESTION ON E (a) Alex Kornbo entered into a five year written lease agreement for office premises with Mercy Omagwa. After

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

Help correct answers.

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
QU ESTION ON E (a) Alex Kornbo entered into a five year written lease agreement for office premises with Mercy Omagwa. After the end of the lease period, the parties agreed that Mercy Omagwa would continue occupying the office premises for another five years. On that basis, Mercy Omagwa made extensive renovations to the office premises. She installed new carpets, painted the premises and put in a new heating system. Alex Kombo later changed his mind and told Mercy Omagwa to vacate the office premises claiming that the lease agreement has expired. With specific reference to promissory estoppel in the law of contract, advise Mercy Omagwa on her legal rights. (10 marks) 4. Amy and Ben have recently moved into a new house together and have purchased a number of items with which they are not satisfied. (a) Explain to Amy and Ben why the law implies terms into certain contracts for the sale of goods. (7 marks)6. (a) Owl Books pic ("Owl Books') discovers that two of its employees, Oscar and Ernest, have regularly been supplying their friends with books and applying a 40% discount to each sale. The employer dismisses Oscar, who has only been working for Owl Books for 14 months, but issues a warning to Ernest, who has a three-year period of service. Briefly analyse whether Owl Books can argue that Oscar was fairly dismissed and the likelihood of success in that argument. (10 marks)2. Greg owns an engineering business making precision parts for hi-fi equipment. In January, he was successful in bidding for a contract with Panhellenic, a major manufacturer of hi-fi equipment. In order to fulfil the contract, Greg entered into an agreement with Proton, a Malaysian company, to manufacture and supply certain precision parts by 30 April. The agreement was priced in pounds sterling and provided that English law would govern it. In February, Proton contacted Greg and told him that because of increased costs due to a change in market circumstances, it was no longer economical for them to continue with the contract at the current price. Greg protested that if Proton did not fulfil the contract, this would mean that he could not perform his contract with Panhellenic. The upshot was that Proton then offered to supply the parts by the end of April and Greg reluctantly agreed to the increased price. Greg paid Proton (including an additional $5,000 which resulted from the increased costs) and the parts were delivered on time. Greg completed the contact with Panhellenic. Required (a) Explain the requirement of consideration for contractual obligations in English law. (10 marks){a} 1|I"ou are approached by James Jolly. the Human Resources director of a large pic in Brenteld, who seeks clarification on various matters relating to the company's obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. You are required to prEpare a detailed report for James: - Outlining the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in relation to discrimination. - Detailing the company's obligations when an employee requests 'reasonable adjustmentsI be made to their working conditions on the grounds of disability. (13 marks) 1. Paul filed a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Dan's Bookstore. During a visit to Dan's Bookstore. Dan stopped Paul as he left the store. Dan accused Paul of stealing a book from the store. After briefly looking into Paul's shopping bag. Dan determined that Paul did not shoplift. He apologized to Paul and released him. On these facts, Dan will likely: a. win the case, because the shopkeepers' privilege statute gives store merchants unconditional immunity (protection) from such lawsuits. b. lose the case, because Paul did not shoplift. C. win the case, but only if a court or trier of fact concludes that Dan had reasonable cause to believe Paul may have shoplifted, detained him for a reasonable time, and in a reasonable manner. lose the case, because Dan did not have a warrant. 2. Bonds wrote McGuire, "I will sell you my house and lot at 419 West Lombard Street, San Francisco, California for $950,000 payable upon merchantable deed, deal to be completed within 60 days of the date of your acceptance." Assuming that Bonds' letter contains terms which are deemed sufficiently certain and definite, which of the following statements is correct? a. Bonds' letter is not an offer unless Bonds intended it to be an offer. b. Bonds' letter is not an offer unless McGuire thought Bonds intended to make an offer. c. Bonds' letter is an offer if a reasonable person with full knowledge of the circumstances would be justified in thinking it was intended as an offer.. d. Bonds' letter is not a offer unless both Bonds and McGuire considered it as an offer. 3. Iverson Jewelers wrote a letter to Miller. "We have received an exceptionally fine self winding Rolox watch which we will sell to you at a very favorable price." The letter is an offer to sell. A valid offer cannot be made by letter. c. The letter contains a valid offer which will terminate within a reasonable time. d. The letter lacks one of the essential elements of an offer. 4, Don was negligently driving south on Merdock Avenue when his car rear-ended a car driven by Patty. The force of the impact forced Patty to rear-end Terry's car. In turn, the force of the second impact caused Terry's car to hit a lamppost, which then fell on a house owned by Paul. The force of the impact scared Paul, causing him to immediately have a heart attack. Paul sues Don for negligence, If Paul recovers, the most likely reason is; a. Paul was able to prove that Don proximately caused Paul's injuries. b. Paul was able to prove that the damages he suffered were actually caused by Don. C. Paul was able to prove that Don breached a duty of due care owed by Don to Paul. d. Paul was able to prove all of the above (a, b & c). 5. Sammy agreed to sell and Larry agreed to buy Sammy's car for $400, payable upon delivery. Sammy delivered and left the car with Larry. However, Larry failed to pay Sammy the $400. After eight years had passed following the delivery and acceptance of the car by Larry, Sammy sued Larry in state court for failure to pay him the $400. Based only on the above stated facts. which of the following statement is most accurate? Assume the UCC applies and the statute of limitations for oral contracts is two years and for written contracts is four years. a. No contract was ever created between Sammy and Larry. b. A contract was created but likely not enforceable because the statute of limitations has expired. A contract was created, but it is only enforceable if it is in writing. d. A contract was created and is enforceable.6. Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking the Sipep, Bill noticed that the can contained dead insects stuck on the inside bottom of the can. In a strict product liability tort action against Ajax, Bill must prove, among other things, that: a. Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep. b. Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition. c. Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products. d. Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can. 7. Under which of the following situations does strict product liability apply? a. Sale of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product. b. Manufacture of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product. Both (a) and (b) are correct. d. Neither (a) nor (b) are correct. 8. On May 1, Back-Talk Computer Store offerd to sell five (5) computer servers to Gatekeeper Company for $5,000.00 each, delivery to be on May 30. Later that day (May 1), Gatekeeper responded that it would buy the computers only if they were delivered within three business days. Back-Talk notified Gatekeeper the next day, May 2, that it would not be able to deliver the goods within the time requested by Gatekeeper. Which of the following is true regarding Back-Talk's offer? a. There is no contract between Back-Talk and Gatekeeper. b. Gatekeeper's additional term became part of the contract, so Back-Talk is obligated to deliver the goods within three business days. C. Back-Talk's offer was accepted by Gatekeeper d. Gatekeeper may later accept Back-Talk's May 1 offer if it is then willing to accept delivery in four weeks. 9. The body of law which establishes rights between persons and provides for redress for violation of those rights is known as: a. Criminal Law. b. Civil Law. C. The Uniform Commercial Code. d. Stare decisi 10. Donny threw a knife at Sally, intending to injure her severely. However, Donny missed Sally. Sally saw the knife just as it whizzed by her head, missing it by about one inch. As a result, Sally was very scared. Sally sued Donny for assault and battery. Which of the following is most correct? a. Donny will be liable for battery, but not assault. b. Donny will be liable for assault, but not battery. c. Donny will be liable for assault and for battery. d. Donny will not be liable for either assault or battery because this is only a criminal matter. 11. In most states the following types of contracts are within the statute of frauds. a. Contracts for the sale of an interest in personal property. b. Contracts that can be performed within a year from the date of their formation. c. Contracts for the sale of goods. d. Contract sfor the sale of goods for a price of $500 or more

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Foundations of the Legal Environment of Business

Authors: Marianne M. Jennings

3rd edition

130511745X, 978-1305465251, 1305465253, 978-1305117457

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Why is an echo weaker than the original sound?

Answered: 1 week ago