Help!

In Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., Justice Stevens wrote for the Court that "[t]he sale of copying equipment...does not constitute contributory infringement if the product is widely used for legitimate, unobjectionable purposes, or, indeed, is merely capable of substantial noninfringing uses." Which option best aligns with his meaning? A. Using copying equipment to watch a show outside its regularly scheduled airing time does not constitute copyright infringement. B. As long as someone is using equipment that is widely used for legitimate, unobjectionable purposes, s/he is not contributing to copyright infringement. C. Contributing to buyers' ability to engage in copyright infringement by selling equipment that allows them to do so contributes to infringement and so creates legal liability for the seller. D. The legitimate purposes and substantial noninfringing uses of copying equipment makes enable