help me find references, i wrote the paper and had a different excel with references and it did not save

The use of facial recognition software in the criminal justice system has been a recent development in technology that has been used for the objectives of increased security and surveillance. This piece of software is a sort of biometric technology that use facial recognition algorithms to determine the identity of a person by comparing the facial characteristics of a picture to a database containing photographs of previously identified people. The use of this technology gives law enforcement agencies a faster and more accurate approach to identify offenders, as well as a more efficient and cost-effective method. Accuracy, speed, and efficiency are just few of the benefits that come along with using face recognition software. This technology can determine a person's identity in a matter of seconds, and it has a success rate of up to 99% of the time. Since a result, there is no longer any room for human mistake in the identification process, as it is far more reliable than approaches that include manual identification. In addition, software that uses face recognition may be used to identify suspects in real time, enabling law enforcement to take prompt action in response to the information.

The possibility for racial and gender prejudice, as well as possible invasions of personal privacy, are among the issues that are presented by face recognition software. Because of the capability of this technology to monitor individuals without either their knowledge or agreement, severe issues relating to privacy have been raised. In addition, face recognition software is not immune to racial or gender prejudice, which may result in the incorrect identification of suspects and the wrongful detention of innocent people. Last but not least, there are certain legal issues that arise with the use of facial recognition software since it is not always obvious when law enforcement agencies should and should not employ this technology.

In order for face recognition software to be utilized in the criminal justice system in a way that is both effective and compliant with ethical standards, it is essential that clear norms and restrictions be developed. These recommendations should define when it is OK to utilize face recognition software and when it is not acceptable to do so. They should also guarantee that the technology is not used in an unfair or discriminatory manner. In addition, it is essential that appropriate steps be made to preserve the privacy of persons by ensuring that face recognition software is only used for lawful reasons. This is an additional reason why it is necessary that these steps be implemented.

2. Medication-assisted therapy, often known as MAT, is a decriminalization program that offers medical treatment and assistance to those who are in need. The program's goal is to decrease the harmful effects of drug misuse and addiction. Those who are battling addiction may get assistance via this program, which includes the administration of medicine in the form of methadone or buprenorphine as well as counseling, social services, and other support services. The benefits of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) include better health outcomes for those who suffer from drug use disorders, lower rates of criminal behavior, and lower rates of fatal overdoses. MAT has the potential to help lessen the physiological and psychological symptoms of addiction, which in turn may lead to better health outcomes for those who struggle with drug use disorders. Additionally, medication-assisted therapy (MAT) has the potential to lower the overall incidence of criminal behavior. This is because those who get treatment are much less likely to participate in criminal behavior compared to those who do not receive treatment. In conclusion, the provision of access to medical care and support services via MAT has the potential to minimize the number of fatalities caused by overdose.

The potential for misuse of the prescriptions, the expense of the program, and the possibility of pharmaceutical theft are all drawbacks associated with medication-assisted treatment (MAT). Medications used in MAT, such as methadone and buprenorphine, have the potential to be misused and may develop to addiction if sufficient monitoring measures are not taken. In addition, since it needs the coordination of several services, including medical, social, and legal assistance, MAT may be rather expensive. Last but not least, there is a possibility that the medicines will be diverted for illegal use since they may be bought, sold, and exchanged on the underground market.

For the medication assisted treatment (MAT) program to be effective, it is essential that the program be appropriately monitored and managed. This may include the use of drug testing, regular visits to providers of health care, and the utilization of medicine packaging that is tamper-resistant.

3. The use of job-embedded mentoring is an evidence-based technique that may increase recruitment and retention of professionals working in the criminal justice system. The purpose of this approach is to give advice and assistance to newly recruited or inexperienced criminal justice professionals by matching them with experienced criminal justice professionals who have worked in the field for some time. Mentors not only serve to develop morale and a feeling of belonging within a company, but they also provide advise and comments on activities that are directly linked to the work.

The benefits of work-embedded mentoring for criminal justice professionals include enhanced job performance, greater job satisfaction, and higher motivation. Professionals working in the field of criminal justice who have access to an experienced mentor may get the essential direction and assistance to ensure that they are able to accomplish their job obligations in an effective and efficient manner. In addition to this, having a mentor may assist in the development of a feeling of community and the creation of possibilities for professional development. The possibility for bias, the potential for conflict between mentors and mentees, and the requirement for resources and staff are some of the drawbacks of job-embedded mentoring. The process of mentoring may result in some people being given advantages over others, which can breed feelings of resentment and hostility amongst the parties involved. The connection that exists between mentors and mentees may be challenging to navigate, which increases the likelihood of disagreements arising between the two parties. Last but not least, mentoring takes a considerable amount of time and resources, which means that it may not be doable for businesses that have a low number of staff members or resources.

It is essential that the program be well managed and controlled for it to be possible for job-embedded mentoring to achieve its goal of being successful. In this context, "this may involve the formulation of clear expectations and rules, as well as the deployment of feedback systems to guarantee that the program is running properly." In addition, it is essential that mentors be picked with caution, and that once chosen, they get the appropriate training and support to ensure that they are able to provide the essential direction and assistance to the mentees under their care.

4. I urge that funds be allocated for job-embedded mentoring as one of the three evidence-based methods for boosting the recruitment and retention of criminal justice professionals. It is possible that the implementation of this practice will lead to improvements in job performance, levels of job satisfaction, and levels of motivation among those working in the criminal justice system. Additionally, mentoring that is integrated into the workplace may contribute to the development of a feeling of community and provide chances for professional development. Because the possible advantages of this method far exceed the potential hazards, it is an outstanding option for financial backing.