...Help me handle these Macroeconomic questions.

Make it your original work please.

1)

Use the IRAC Method to breifly identify the Issue, the Legal Rule (Legal Test), the Facts Applied to the Test (Analysis), and the Conclusion/ Holding of the case.

. Brian Davis held group land indi- vidnal] meetings [with the technicians]. instances acted unlawfully to frustrate .. One week before the election, their employees' protected rights to . ." AutoNation vice president * *. " Berryhill * * * announced that the engage in concerted activity and to orga- nize a union. Davis coercively interrogated a * * . dealership was working on fixing prob- technician, Tumeshwar Persaud * *. lens the technicians had and that he . . " The dealership violated [the Davis * * asked him how he felt about was replacing two team leaders, [Andre] Grobler and Oudit Manbahal, with new Act] in the run-up to the election by the union election. * *" The question coercively creating an impression of forced Persaud, who had not previously ram leaders. disclosed his union support, either to surveillance of union activity, interro- .Technician Anthony Roberts disclose his own union sympathies or gating employees about union activity, .was then playing a leading role in to report on his perception of his fellow and soliciting and promising to remedy the union organizing. * *. About a week employees union support. employee grievances. before the union election, the dealership . * Davis held a meeting with hid off Roberts, though Roberts had a employees at which he solicited [Team Leader] Grobler created a employee complaints and, upon hearing higher skill rating, more hours, and more coercive impression of surveillance that management had been unresponsive imiority than many other technicians. when he commented on technician Juan to employee complaints in the past, said Cazorla's attendance of union meetings. that employees could call him or talk ." The technicians voted in favor * * * Grobler asked [ Cazorla] why he to him at any time. This meeting was of unionizing. was in such a rush to leave work * * * part of a series of * * * meetings that .After the election, the dealer- suggesting that Cazorla had "that meet- management held in the run-up to the hip challenged the certification of the ing" to go to. Cazorla pretended not to union election. * * * Davis was implicitly union is the exclusive representative know what Grobler was talking about, promising to remedy grievances with the of a bargaining unit consisting of ser- although he was in fact rushing to get goal of frustrating the union effort. ride technicians. " ." The | National to a union meeting. Again [on a differ- Labor Relations] Board affirmed the ent occasion] Grobler commented to . * * AutoNation " * * promul- certification. Cazorla that he had "better rush" since gated [publicized] an overly broad ""The Board * * * filed a com- he had a meeting * * * . It would have no-solicitation policy in the employee plaint alleging that the dealership and been reasonable for Cazorla to infer from handbook used at all of its facilities. Fumo Nation had violated * ". the Grobler's comments that his union activi- . . . AutoNation's policy prohibited any National Labor Relations Act. * * *An cies were under management surveillance. solicitation on AutoNation property at administrative law judge found * *. any time. "*" The policy " "* amounted that the dealership and AutoNation had * * * Berryhill coercively interrogated to an unfair labor practice because of the indeed violated the Act by interfering employees [when he] called them indi likelihood it would chill protected con- with their employees' protected rights to vidually into his office and asked them certed arriving [ Emphasis added. ] engage in concerted activity and to orga- about union activity. The dealership's Give a union [and] by firing Anthony service director was also present. " . . * * * The dealership's discharge of Roberts due to anti-union animus [hos- The setting of the meetings in Berryhill's Anthony Roberts * *" a week before the uityl. [The judge ordered the dealership office, Berryhill's and the director's posi- election was motivated by anti-union tions of authority and the fact that each animus. to cease its interference with its employ rights and to reinstate Roberts. The rechnician was alone and outnumbered we've also ordered Auto Nation to post a by managers all support the finding of * * * Berryhill's identification of Rob eres as a troublemaker and instigator of notice at all of its dealerships that it was coercion. the organizational campaign established Micinding the no-solicitation rule.] The that anti-union animus was a substantial Board affirmed the * * * order. * * * At the * * * meetings, Berryhill The dealership and AutoNation peti- asked the technicians how the dealership factor motivating Roberts's layoff * . . The dealership's stated reason for fir- looted [the U.S. Court of Appeals for could improve. * * * Berryhill [stated] ing Roberts-that he lacked sufficient leventh Circuit] for judi or judicial review. [The that he was "working on" the problems electronic diagnostic skills-failed to NI.HB cross-petitioned for enforcement and "in progress" on the solutions. establish that Roberts would have been of the neder.) . * *The * *" meetings also included laid off in the absence of anti-union ani- inquiries about the union effort. * * * mus. * * * Roberts was more productive The administrative law judge found. This was an effort to frustrate the union and had a higher skill racing than many and the Board affirmed, that the dealer- organizing drive by soliciting and at least technicians who were retained. ship and Auto Nation in a number of implicitly promising to adjust grievances. Cave 34.3 ContinueUCC HYPOTHETICAL # 1 Jake is VP. Sales at Acme Insurance Company, and has become extremely interested in modern art. He has been buying/selling modern art for 6+ years. Jake hires Brittany, a modern art gallery owner. to advise him in buying local modern art. Brandon, a rising local artist who is making a name for himself in graphic novel art, offers Jake a 4 x 8' painting from his latest graphic novel for $10,000, Brittany, on Jake's behalf, emails a counteroffer of $7,000. Brandon makes no response but just ships the painting off to Brittany's gallery. Unfortunately, on the way to the gallery, the truck has an accident and burns up. Luckily. no one was hurt, but the painting did not survive. Is there a K? Why or why not? If so, what are the terms? Who bears the risk of loss of the painting? Brandon or Jake? Explain your answer. UCC HYPOTHETICAL # 2 Mark is a widget maker. Dale has been buying widgets, of No. I quality. in 10,000 unit batches to use in his manufacturing process. for over 10 years now. One or two orders every month. Dale just calls up Mark and says he needs another batch and Mark ships them along. No forms: Mark ships, Dale pays. The last batch did not work and Dale wasted a whole manufacturing run due to bad widgets. Mark visited Dale's plant regularly to keep in touch with a (formerly) good customer; therefore, Mark was very familiar with how Dale used the widgets in his process. They have been doing this for so long, that they have not exchanged any paperwork or forms for many years. However, on each box of widgets, there is stamped "NO WARRANTIES," just like for every other of Mark's customer. Is there a K? If so, what are the terms? Is there a warranty of any sort? If so, what type? Was any warranty disclaimed? Why or why not? Who wins the lawsuit when Dale sues Mark for the bad widgets ruining his manufacturing run? UCC HYPOTHETICAL # 3 Petra is a retailer who owns and operates a widget retail shop here in Napa. She orders 500 new, cutting edge widgets from Nu-Widget, Inc. Nu-Widget's salesman, Brad, was very persuasive. Brad said the new widgets were the first of their kind, would "WOW" the customers, sell like "hotcakes," and make Petra a "boatload" of money. And, if they did not sell, Ralph would "cat his hat." Apparently, the customers were not as impressed as Petra. The widgets did not sell. Not even one! So, Petra shipped the whole batch back to Nu-Widget and demanded her money back. Nu-Widget said "No." Was there a K? What were the terms? Was there a warranty; if so, what kind? Who wins the lawsuit Petra brings to recover her payment Nu-Widget? Why?CASE STUDY: Bank failures in the 1930s August 1929 March 1933 % change M 26.5 19.0 -28.3% C 3.9 5.5 41.0 D 22.6 13.5 -40.3 B 7.1 8.4 18.3 C 3.9 5.5 41.0 R 3.2 2.9 -9.4 m 3.7 2.3 -37.8 rr 0.14 0.21 50.0 cr 0.17 0.41 141.2As a Case Study in the chapter discusses, the money supply fell from 1929 to 1933 because both the currency deposit ratio and the reserve deposit ralio increased. Use the model of the money supply and the data in Table 11-- 2 toanswer the followinghypothecal questions about this episode. +' +1 a. 'Whatwould have happened to the money supply if the currency deposit ratio had risen but the reserve deposit raiio had remained the same?I :4 'J b. What would have happened to the money supply if the reserve deposit ratio had risen but the currency deposit ratio had remained the same? 14 'J c. Which of the two changes was more responsible for the fallin the money supplyi'anJl Contemporary Cars, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 814 F.3d 859 (2016). In the Language of the Court as over 200 other dealerships throughout themselves and held HAMILTON, Circuit Judge the United States. off-site meetings. This case focuses on the dealership's . . Contemporary Can, Inc.. service department [which the dealership . . The union filed its repress * * * sells and services cars in Maitland, had previously split into three teams]. petition. The [ National Labor Relicin Florida, Bob Berryhill, the dealership's * * * The International Association Board] approved the proposed bup general manager, is responsible for the of Machinists began a campaign * *. dealership's overall operations, " . . unit, and an election was scheduled to organize the service technicians. Auto Nation owns the dealership, as well In the weeks before the election, A . . . The technicians talked among ryhill and AutoNation vice preside