Here is a quote from the United States Supreme Court that comes up almost everytime there is a question about whether a particular right is part of the "liberty" guaranteed by the due process clause... \"While this court has not attempted to dene with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed [by the due process clause], the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been denitely stated. Without doubt, [\"liberty\"] denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.\" Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US. 390, 400 (1923). How do you think the court would apply this quote in cases ofthings like -the right to marryr someone of another race? --the right to marry someone of the same gender? --the right of a parent to raise a child in a particular religious tradition? --other rights that we think of as central to our pursuit of happiness? Let's watch and discuss this short video for more information on how substantive due process works in a particular case: litpyoumbechI-li'ii'qnaxY Are substantive due process rights specically listed in the Constitution? If so, please quote the portions of the Constitution listing those substantive due process rights. If not, then how do we know what those rights are? What are at least 5 liberties that are currently considered by the Supreme Court to be substantive due process rights? 4. Is it legal for the government pass or enforce a law limiting substantive due process rights? Explain