Here is the case study:

Mr Wong owns a three-storey village-type house in Yuen Long. He utilizes the place as a "drop-in centre" for young homeless people every weekend. The centre is well-liked and often attracts some very rowdy youngsters. However, Mary, who occupies the premises next to the land, holds meditation classes for people and expresses dissatisfaction. According to her, the youngsters from the centre are constantly peering through the windows of her premises and the noise from the centre interferes with her meditation classes. Some of her clients feel uncomfortable and have decided to quit the classes, causing a loss of business to Mary.

Could you give me advise on whether Mary of her rights in tort of nuisance on:

1 .she should sue Mr Wong or the youngsters?

2. she can prove that the interference is not reasonable?

3.what remedies are available to her?

I do not have clue with using what law example could explain the Mr wong property law as well