Hernando de Soto makes two claims:

• "Capital, like energy, is . . . a dormant value."
• "What creates capital in the West . . . is an implicit process buried in the intricacies of its formal property systems."

Keeping Irving Fisher's concept of capital in mind, explain the economic cause-and-effect logic related to how those two claims work together to resolve "the mystery of capital." As part of your explanation, comment on why, from the perspective of entrepreneurs or businesses creating ever-more-valuable amalgams, Property Effect #4 (Making Assets Fungible) may be the most important effectbut also why this effect necessarily relies on the systemic support of the other five effects.

link :

https://yendieu.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/the-mystery-of-capital.pdf

Chapter 1-3

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Mystery-of-Capital%3A-Why-Capitalism-Triumphs-in-Soto/bf9b6f1fe8a8de0dc328daef207c459e8c6f11f5

Chapters 1-3 of de Soto, H. (2000).The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else.New York, NY: Basic Books.