Hey! hope youre doing great. I URGENTLY need help with finding potential Canadian Cases/Law Journals/Statues to back up my points. Could you please please help me out with finding these potential sources? I apologize as I am really really anxious as the due date is tonight and I'm so stuck. Thank you so much for your help, i really appreciate it.

When negotiating the original contract with the Hotel, Gould should have considered the following legal issues:

1. The duration of the contract: Gould should have specified a specific term for the contract, either a fixed date or a date based on certain events such as the Hotel's closure. This would have given Gould more certainty with regards to the duration of the agreement and could have avoided potential legal issues.

2. The conditions of the contract: Gould should have specified the conditions of the contract such as the percentage of the parking revenue to be paid by the Hotel, the scope of liability of each party, and the remedies available in case of breach of the agreement.

3. The termination clause: Gould should have included a termination clause in the contract specifying the conditions under which either party could terminate the agreement. This clause could have provided Gould with more legal protection in case of termination of the agreement by the Hotel.