Hi, can you help me? So the question sound like this

Framed this way, drilling in the Arctic presents a way for Americans to mitigate risks from dependence on foreign oil and build the local and national economies by creating jobs and supplying cheap oil. Environmentalists argue that oil companies have not demonstrated the capability to clean up an oil spill in water obstructed by ice.

So what do you think another example that suitable contentious issue that has been framed in an "either-or" way? What would be an ethically ideal way to resolve this issue and why? Thank you