Hi,

Can you please give reply on the paragraph mentioned below. In statement yes, I agreed and few lines explanation.

The Lavigne case addressed the issue of mandatory union dues, with the Supreme Court ultimately upholding the requirement, recognizing the need for unions to have financial support for effective collective bargaining. The Advance Cutting and Coring case dealt with Quebec legislation mandating union membership, which was upheld but raised concerns about limiting workers' choice and freedom of association.

The right to strike is essential for collective bargaining but may need limitations in certain professions or industries to ensure public safety and the economy's stability. These cases underscore the need to balance individual rights with the collective interests of workers and the broader public good.