Hi, i am really confused with the research question ( listed below). Can i please get some advice in regards to this. Is it fair to say that a 2-way mixed ANOVA is used. IV 1 as message framed with two levels, positive and negative, independent groups. IV 2 has three levels " potential consequences", "benefits actions" and "benefits inaction". The DV is the " climate behavioural intention". Please help.. i am really struggling with this scenario. Scenario As a research psychologist, you have been hired by Australia's Climate Council to conduct research into the factors that influence climate change action. Based on a review of the recent literature into science communication, you know that simply providing people with the facts about climate change has been ineffective in influencing acceptance of anthropogenic climate change and prompting behavioural action. Instead, you think that how the information is communicated (i.e., framed) will influence engagement with climate change. You want to investigate whether gain-framed or positive-framed messages (e.g., highlighting the benefits of behavioural change) are more (or less) effective in producing behavioural change than loss-framed or negative-framed messages (e.g., highlighting the negatives of behavioural inaction). You plan to design a study where you manipulate the different message frames for communicating climate change evidence, and the potential consequences or benefits of behavioural action or inaction. The dependent variable in this study is behavioural intention towards climate change action, measured using a 22-item likert-response style questionnaire that is summed to produce a mean score for each participant