Hi,

I am working on this Business Law case study and would love some assistance. I don't have the textbook which makes it harder to amswer these questions in the format required, please help thank you.

Class 3 Contract Exercise Instructions: Answer the questions and submit online via Webcourses before the start of class. No late or incomplete assignment are accepted. Answers can be written out or bulleted/outlined. (Estimated time to complete: 1 hour). Resource: The Legal Environment of Business; A Managerial Approach: Theory to Practice 3rd Edition Chapters 6, 7, 8. Facts: Lisa owned and advertised for sale vacant lot A for $100,000. On February 15, Max gave Lisa a signed written offer to buy lot A for $70,000. On February 17, Lisa gave Max a written counter offer stating that she would accept $80,000 for lot A, but Max needed to accept this counter offer on or before March 1. On February 20, Lisa, without receiving a response from Max to her February 17 counter offer, gave Max another written counter offer stating that she would accept $85,000 for lot A, but Max had, again, only until March 1 to accept this counter offer. On February 22, Max gave Lisa another written offer to buy lot A for $75,000. Lisa did not respond to this offer by Max. On February 25, Max called Lisa stating that he agreed to accept her February 17 counter offer for lot A for $80,000. Max also mailed Lisa a countersigned copy of lisa's written counter offer along with a $10,000 deposit check. Lisa accepted this check but she eventually wrote "VOID" on the check instead of cashing it. On March 1, Lisa contacted Max advising him that she was not going to sell him lot A and Max responded that he would file a lawsuit against her. On March 2, Lisa sold lot A for $100,000. Do Lisa and Max have a contract? (Hint: answer this last) 21. Which law applies Common Law or UCCP Focus BA No Spac... Heading 1 Heading 2 Heading Paragraph Styles She eventually wrote "VOID on the check instead of cashing it. On March 1, Lisa contacted Max advising him that she was not going to sell him lot A and Max responded that he would file a lawsuit against her. On March 2, Lisa sold lot A for $100,000. 1) Do Lisa and Max have a contract? (Hint: answer this last) 2) Which law applies Common Law or UCC? 3) Lisa advertised Lot A for Sale. Is this an offer? Why? 4) February 15 written communication from Max to Lisa to buy Lot A for $70,000. Is this an offer? Was there acceptance? Why? 5) February 17 counteroffer from Lisa to Max accepting $80,000 for lot Aif Max accepts this offer by March 1. February 20 second counteroffer from Lisa to Max ($85,000 by March 1) without any response from Max. Can Lisa do this? Why? 6) February 22 written communication from Max to Lisa to buy Lot A for $75,000. What is this? What does that mean? 7) Max's acceptance on February 25 of Lisa's offer to buy Lot A for $80,000. What is this? What does that mean? D. Foe CH o Paragraph Sty + 1 8) Does Lisa have any defenses? 9) What if Lisa cashed the check, is there a contract? 10) If Lisa cashed the check, what type of remedy would Max be entitled to: Reliance, Restitution, Expectation, or Specific Performance? Why? How to Complete Cases Studies This class is a flipped class, which means you teach yourself the material by reading the textbook and viewing the PowerPoints (see below if you don't have your textbook yet) and applying what you learn to a case study. Case studies are a way for you to demonstrate your legal knowledge by showing me your legal analysis (not opinion) regarding the facts. A mnemonic to help you think through this is IRAC. . Issue (Identify the issue. Is this an intentional tort?) Rule (State the rule. The prima facie case for an intentional tort is...) Application (The facts of this case indicate there is/is not an intentional tort because...) Conclusion (Yes an intentional tort occurred/No it did not) In order to get the "pass" for the assignment: Every question must be answered (even if to say N/A or No and briefly explain why) AND Every question must be answered thoughtfully by applying the rule of law as defined in the assigned materials to the facts at hand and showing me that analysis. For example, if the question asks: Did the tort of negligence occur? If yes, explain how the plaintiff would argue each element (also known as prima facie case) of the negligence claim. A failing answer would be: The tort of negligence occurred because the coffee was very hot and scaled the customer This is a failing grade because the student did not answer the question asked. They did not tell me what the prima facie case is and did not argue each element of the case using the facts in the case study. I also cannot tell if the student read the book/PPT or did no work at all, as this answer could be an opinion A passing answer would be . Duty Did the tortfeasor owe a duty of care to the injured party? A failing answer would be: The tort of negligence occurred because the coffee was very hot and scaled the customer. This is a failing grade because the student did not answer the question asked. They did not tell me what the prima facie case is and did not argue each element of the case using the facts in the case study. I also cannot tell if the student read the book/PPT or did no work at all, as this answer could be an opinion. A passing answer would be: Duty: Did the tortfeasor owe a duty of care to the injured party? . o Yes/No. Here the duty prong is/is not met because... Breach of duty: Did the tortfeasor fail to exercise reasonable care? o Yes/No. Here a breach of duty did/did not occur because.. Cause in fact: But for the breach of duty by the tortfeasor, would the injured party have suffered damage? Yes/No. Here the "but for test is/is not satisfied because... Proximate Cause: Was the Defendant the proximate cause of the damages? Yes/No. Here the proximate cause test is/is not satisfied because... Actual damages: Did the injured party suffer harm? Yes/No. Here the plaintiff was/was not injured when... Things that make me a happy grader: Answering on the word document provided in blue font so I can quickly see your answers. I'm not going to get my book until after the tort assignment is due: All of the Tort prima facie cases and all of the tort defenses are available in the Tort class PowerPoint. Likewise, you can Google "what are the elements of a prima facie case of negligence" to get the information you need. Google will not work for the entire class, but it will help you through the first assignment. You can also call the UCF library and see if you can check out one of the editions of the book. Class 3 Contract Exercise Instructions: Answer the questions and submit online via Webcourses before the start of class. No late or incomplete assignment are accepted. Answers can be written out or bulleted/outlined. (Estimated time to complete: 1 hour). Resource: The Legal Environment of Business; A Managerial Approach: Theory to Practice 3rd Edition Chapters 6, 7, 8. Facts: Lisa owned and advertised for sale vacant lot A for $100,000. On February 15, Max gave Lisa a signed written offer to buy lot A for $70,000. On February 17, Lisa gave Max a written counter offer stating that she would accept $80,000 for lot A, but Max needed to accept this counter offer on or before March 1. On February 20, Lisa, without receiving a response from Max to her February 17 counter offer, gave Max another written counter offer stating that she would accept $85,000 for lot A, but Max had, again, only until March 1 to accept this counter offer. On February 22, Max gave Lisa another written offer to buy lot A for $75,000. Lisa did not respond to this offer by Max. On February 25, Max called Lisa stating that he agreed to accept her February 17 counter offer for lot A for $80,000. Max also mailed Lisa a countersigned copy of lisa's written counter offer along with a $10,000 deposit check. Lisa accepted this check but she eventually wrote "VOID" on the check instead of cashing it. On March 1, Lisa contacted Max advising him that she was not going to sell him lot A and Max responded that he would file a lawsuit against her. On March 2, Lisa sold lot A for $100,000. Do Lisa and Max have a contract? (Hint: answer this last) 21. Which law applies Common Law or UCCP Focus BA No Spac... Heading 1 Heading 2 Heading Paragraph Styles She eventually wrote "VOID on the check instead of cashing it. On March 1, Lisa contacted Max advising him that she was not going to sell him lot A and Max responded that he would file a lawsuit against her. On March 2, Lisa sold lot A for $100,000. 1) Do Lisa and Max have a contract? (Hint: answer this last) 2) Which law applies Common Law or UCC? 3) Lisa advertised Lot A for Sale. Is this an offer? Why? 4) February 15 written communication from Max to Lisa to buy Lot A for $70,000. Is this an offer? Was there acceptance? Why? 5) February 17 counteroffer from Lisa to Max accepting $80,000 for lot Aif Max accepts this offer by March 1. February 20 second counteroffer from Lisa to Max ($85,000 by March 1) without any response from Max. Can Lisa do this? Why? 6) February 22 written communication from Max to Lisa to buy Lot A for $75,000. What is this? What does that mean? 7) Max's acceptance on February 25 of Lisa's offer to buy Lot A for $80,000. What is this? What does that mean? D. Foe CH o Paragraph Sty + 1 8) Does Lisa have any defenses? 9) What if Lisa cashed the check, is there a contract? 10) If Lisa cashed the check, what type of remedy would Max be entitled to: Reliance, Restitution, Expectation, or Specific Performance? Why? How to Complete Cases Studies This class is a flipped class, which means you teach yourself the material by reading the textbook and viewing the PowerPoints (see below if you don't have your textbook yet) and applying what you learn to a case study. Case studies are a way for you to demonstrate your legal knowledge by showing me your legal analysis (not opinion) regarding the facts. A mnemonic to help you think through this is IRAC. . Issue (Identify the issue. Is this an intentional tort?) Rule (State the rule. The prima facie case for an intentional tort is...) Application (The facts of this case indicate there is/is not an intentional tort because...) Conclusion (Yes an intentional tort occurred/No it did not) In order to get the "pass" for the assignment: Every question must be answered (even if to say N/A or No and briefly explain why) AND Every question must be answered thoughtfully by applying the rule of law as defined in the assigned materials to the facts at hand and showing me that analysis. For example, if the question asks: Did the tort of negligence occur? If yes, explain how the plaintiff would argue each element (also known as prima facie case) of the negligence claim. A failing answer would be: The tort of negligence occurred because the coffee was very hot and scaled the customer This is a failing grade because the student did not answer the question asked. They did not tell me what the prima facie case is and did not argue each element of the case using the facts in the case study. I also cannot tell if the student read the book/PPT or did no work at all, as this answer could be an opinion A passing answer would be . Duty Did the tortfeasor owe a duty of care to the injured party? A failing answer would be: The tort of negligence occurred because the coffee was very hot and scaled the customer. This is a failing grade because the student did not answer the question asked. They did not tell me what the prima facie case is and did not argue each element of the case using the facts in the case study. I also cannot tell if the student read the book/PPT or did no work at all, as this answer could be an opinion. A passing answer would be: Duty: Did the tortfeasor owe a duty of care to the injured party? . o Yes/No. Here the duty prong is/is not met because... Breach of duty: Did the tortfeasor fail to exercise reasonable care? o Yes/No. Here a breach of duty did/did not occur because.. Cause in fact: But for the breach of duty by the tortfeasor, would the injured party have suffered damage? Yes/No. Here the "but for test is/is not satisfied because... Proximate Cause: Was the Defendant the proximate cause of the damages? Yes/No. Here the proximate cause test is/is not satisfied because... Actual damages: Did the injured party suffer harm? Yes/No. Here the plaintiff was/was not injured when... Things that make me a happy grader: Answering on the word document provided in blue font so I can quickly see your answers. I'm not going to get my book until after the tort assignment is due: All of the Tort prima facie cases and all of the tort defenses are available in the Tort class PowerPoint. Likewise, you can Google "what are the elements of a prima facie case of negligence" to get the information you need. Google will not work for the entire class, but it will help you through the first assignment. You can also call the UCF library and see if you can check out one of the editions of the book