Hi, I need help with the law, application and conclusion part of this question. Apparently, the law in this case is "illegitimate pressure".

QUESTION 1 Kitty owns a wholesale business called Hello Vending which supplies vending machines to retail businesses. She has a contract with an import business named Yamaguchi Imports to purchase 100 vending machines for $1,500 each. She just secured a contract to supply 75 vending machines to Sanrio, a large retail chain, for $2,000 each, ma king a net prot of 10% after cost and taxes. One day, the owner of Yamaguchi, named 5m calls Kitty and says that the prices from the Japanese manufacturer have suddenly gone up and that he is no longer willing to supply the vending machines at the agreed price of $1,500.5gggpp1 says he will now only sell the vending machines at $1,800 each. Kitty says that is completely unfair and that they had an agreement. 5m refuses to accept that and insists that the price is now 51,800. Kitty is angry, but she desperately needs the vending machines so that she can supply them to Sanrio which is one of her best customers. But she also understands that prices sometimes go up and reluctantly agrees to pay $1,800 for each vending machine instead of the original price of $1,500 even though she knows she will not make any profit on selling them to Sanrio. She thinks of it rather as good marketing to keep her best customer but also thinks that Yamaguchi should honour their initial agreement. The owner of Hello Vending, Kitty, has a contract with Yamaguchi Imports to buy 100 vending machines for $1,500 each. A recently signed a contract with Sanrio, to supply 1'5 vending machines for $2,000 each is settled. Yamaguchi claimed that manufacturers prices have inated and will now only supply machines to Hello Vending at $1,800 each. Knowing her profit will decline, Kitty still agreed to this deal. However, believes the initial agreement should still be honoured. ISSUE: The issue in this case is whether or not Kitty acted with illegitimate pressure against Yamagu chi owner. Emu. LAW: illegiti m ate p ressu re. APPLICATION: Apply the legal principles you have identied in the \"Law\" section above to the facts of the situation in the problem. You should determine which ofthe facts are slmllar to those in previous cases lie. within the ratio mm a previous decision} and which can be distinguished from previous cases due to differences in the facts. an "obiter dicta" from a real or constructed case is helpful